Land-use trade-offs between tree biodiversity and crop production in the Atlantic Forest

被引:9
|
作者
Marcilio-Silva, Vinicius [1 ]
Marques, Marcia C. M. [1 ]
Cavender-Bares, Jeannine [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Parana, Setor Ciencias Biol, Lab Ecol Vegetal, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Minnesota, Inst Environm, Dept Ecol Evolut & Behav, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
biodiversity measurement; cropland; deforestation; ecosystem services; sustainability; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; PATTERNS; DIVERSITY; INTENSIFICATION; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSERVATION; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.13138
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Trade-offs in ecosystem services (ES) have received increasing attention because provisioning services often come at the expense of biodiversity loss. When land-use patterns are not maximally efficient relative to productivity, provisioning services, such as crop production, can often be increased without losing biodiversity. The Atlantic Forest (AF) encompasses dense, mixed, and seasonal forests and has high levels of endemism and anthropogenic threat. We examined trade-offs between biodiversity and crop production in the AF to provide insights into land-use management decisions. We developed a biodiversity metric that combines information on tree species richness, evolutionary distinctiveness, and rarity at the local level. We examined the extent to which the nature of ES trade-offs differ among the 3 forest types. We assessed how annual deforestation rates and land management practices affect biodiversity and agricultural revenues. Finally, we tested whether it is possible to achieve the same total regional revenue without reducing biodiversity by improving local management practices. The 3 forest types had similar patterns in ES trade-offs, although within mixed forest patterns differed. Biodiversity appeared to be more sensitive to land-use change than crop revenues. Certain crops yielded up to 10 times higher values in some sites. Enhanced crop productivity may increase revenues without reducing biodiversity. Our results showed that to enhance human well-being without further conversion of AF, maximizing crop productivity is needed . Increasing efficiency of management outcomes by maintaining higher biodiversity and increasing provisioning services depends on knowledge of forest type, the comparative advantage of planting crops in the best places, and preserving species in a balanced manner across forests. Compensaciones de Uso de Suelo entre la Biodiversidad de arboles y la Produccion Agricola en el Bosque Atlantico Las compensaciones en los servicios ecosistemicos (SE) han recibido mayor atencion porque los servicios de aprovisionamiento a menudo conllevan la perdida de biodiversidad. Cuando los patrones de uso de suelo no son maximamente eficientes en relacion con la productividad, los servicios de aprovisionamiento, como la produccion agricola, a menudo pueden ser incrementados sin perder biodiversidad. El Bosque Atlantico (BA) comprende bosques densos, mixtos y estacionales y tiene altos niveles de endemismo y amenazas antropogenicas. Examinamos las compensaciones entre biodiversidad y produccion agricola en el BA para proporcionar ideas para las decisiones de manejo de uso de suelo. Desarrollamos una medida de la biodiversidad que combina informacion sobre la riqueza de arboles, la singularidad evolutiva y rareza a nivel local Examinamos el grado en que la naturaleza de las compensaciones de los SE difiere entre los 3 tipos de bosque. Evaluamos como afectan las tasas anuales de deforestacion y las practicas de manejo a la biodiversidad y a las ganancias agricolas. Finalmente, probamos si es posible obtener la misma ganancia regional total son reducir la biodiversidad mediante la mejora de las practicas de manejo locales. Los 3 tipos de bosque tuvieron patrones similares de compensaciones de SE, aunque los patrones difirieron en los bosques mixtos. La biodiversidad parecio ser mas sensible al cambio de uso de suelo que a las ganancias agricolas. Ciertos cultivos proporcionaron valores 10 veces mas altos en algunos sitios. El incremento de la produccion agricola puede incrementar las ganancias sin reducir la biodiversidad. Nuestros resultados muestran que para incrementar el bienestar humano sin mayor alteracion del BA se requiere maximizar la produccion agricola. El incremento de la eficiencia del manejo al mantener mas biodiversidad y aumentar los servicios de aprovisionamiento depende del conocimiento del tipo de bosque, de la ventaja comparativa de sembrar cultivos en los mejores sitios y la preservacion de especies de manera equilibrada en los bosques. Resumen ???? ???????????????????, ????????????????????????????????????????????, ????????????????, ????????????????????????????????, ????, ????????????????????????????????????????????, ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????, ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????, ???????????????????, ????????????????????????????????????????????, ????????????????????, ???????????????????????, ????????????????????????, ??????????????????????????, ??????????????????????????, ??????????????????????????????????????????????, ???????????????????????, ???????????????????????: ???; ??: ???? Article impact statement: Human well-being can be enhanced without further conversion of Atlantic Forest by improving agricultural practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1074 / 1084
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trade-Offs Between Biodiversity Conservation and Economic Development in Five Tropical Forest Landscapes
    Sandker, Marieke
    Ruiz-Perez, Manuel
    Campbell, Bruce M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 50 (04) : 633 - 644
  • [32] Trade-Offs Between Biodiversity Conservation and Economic Development in Five Tropical Forest Landscapes
    Marieke Sandker
    Manuel Ruiz-Perez
    Bruce M. Campbell
    Environmental Management, 2012, 50 : 633 - 644
  • [33] Trade-offs between forest ecosystem services
    Wang, Shuai
    Fu, Bojie
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 26 : 145 - 146
  • [34] Trade-offs between land use intensity and avian biodiversity in the dry Chaco of Argentina: A tale of two gradients
    Macchi, Leandro
    Ricardo Grau, H.
    Zelaya, Patricia V.
    Marinaro, Sofia
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 174 : 11 - 20
  • [35] Climate-Smart Agriculture and Trade-Offs With Biodiversity and Crop Yield
    Tripathi, Hemant G.
    Kunin, William E.
    Smith, Harriet E.
    Sallu, Susannah Mary
    Maurice, Sixbert
    Machera, Suzan D.
    Davies, Rhiannon
    Florence, Mosha
    Eze, Samuel
    Yamdeu, J. H. Galani
    Sait, Steven Mark
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2022, 6
  • [36] Towards productive landscapes: Trade-offs in tree-cover and income across a matrix of smallholder agricultural land-use systems
    Rahman, Syed Ajijur
    Sunderland, Terry
    Kshatriya, Mrigesh
    Roshetko, James M.
    Pagella, Tim
    Healey, John R.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 58 : 152 - 164
  • [37] Considering land-sea interactions and trade-offs for food and biodiversity
    Cottrell, Richard S.
    Fleming, Aysha
    Fulton, Elizabeth A.
    Nash, Kirsty L.
    Watson, Reg A.
    Blanchard, Julia L.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (02) : 580 - 596
  • [38] The 'sustainability gap' of US broiler chicken production: trade-offs between welfare, land use and consumption
    Chan, Iris
    Franks, Becca
    Hayek, Matthew N.
    ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 9 (06):
  • [39] The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches
    Hua, Fangyuan
    Bruijnzeel, L. Adrian
    Meli, Paula
    Martin, Philip A.
    Zhang, Jun
    Nakagawa, Shinichi
    Miao, Xinran
    Wang, Weiyi
    McEvoy, Christopher
    Pena-Arancibia, Jorge Luis
    Brancalion, Pedro H. S.
    Smith, Pete
    Edwards, David P.
    Balmford, Andrew
    SCIENCE, 2022, 376 (6595) : 839 - +
  • [40] Proximity to forest mediates trade-offs between yields and biodiversity of birds in oil palm smallholdings
    Hamer, Keith C.
    Sasu, Michael A.
    Ofosuhene, Linda
    Asare, Rebecca
    Ossom, Benjamin
    Parr, Catherine L.
    Scriven, Sarah A.
    Asante, Winston
    Addico, Rosemary
    Hill, Jane K.
    BIOTROPICA, 2021, 53 (06) : 1498 - 1509