Oncotype DX 21-gene test has a low recurrence score in both pure and mixed mucinous breast carcinoma

被引:7
|
作者
Chen, Rui [1 ]
Wang, Yun [1 ]
Li, Taolang [1 ]
Lv, Junyuan [1 ]
Feng, Guoli [1 ]
Tan, Na [2 ]
Wang, Jinjing [2 ]
Cheng, Xiaoming [1 ]
机构
[1] Zunyi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Thyroid & Breast Surg, 149 Dalian Rd, Zunyi 563000, Guizhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zunyi Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Pathol, 149 Dalian Rd, Zunyi 563000, Guizhou, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
mucinous breast carcinoma; 21-gene recurrence score assay; prognosis; chemotherapy; endocrine therapy; INFILTRATING DUCTAL CARCINOMA; CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS; GENE-EXPRESSION; CANCER; ASSAY; POPULATION; UTILITY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3892/ol.2021.13032
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The Oncotype DX 21-gene test can be used to predict chemotherapy efficacy in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer; however, the data on the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) for mucinous breast carcinoma (MBC) are limited. The present study aimed to evaluate the distribution pattern and clinical value of the 21-gene RS in patients with MBC. A total of 38 pure MBC (PMBC) and 11 mixed MBC (MMBC) cases were retrospectively analyzed, and a total of 29 ER-positive and HER2-negative MBCs underwent the Oncotype DX 21-gene test. There were no statistically significant differences between the PMBCs and MMBCs in age, tumor size and molecular subtype; however, patients with MMBC showed a significantly higher incidence rate of nodal metastases compared with that in patients with PMBC (72.7 vs. 16.2%, respectively). Following surgery, 87.8 and 59.2% of the enrolled patients received endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, respectively. With a median follow-up of 65.6 months, the 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 97.0 and 100.0%, respectively. The 21-gene test revealed that the proportions of patients with MBC categorized into low (RS <18), intermediate (RS >= 18-30) and high (RS >= 30) risk groups were 51.7, 44.8 and 3.5%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the PMBC and MMBC cases. Notably, among the genes in the 21-gene RS testing, the expression levels of cathepsin V, progesterone receptor (PR) and CD68 were significantly higher in the PMBC group compared with that in the MMBC group. In conclusion, the current study demonstrated that patients with MBC had a favorable prognosis, and both PMBC and MMBC cases had a low- and intermediate-risk RS, which suggests that a considerable proportion of patients may be able to avoid chemotherapy. In addition, the high expression level of PR, based on the 21-gene test in PMBCs, indicated that they may have a more favorable response to endocrine therapy than MMBCs.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Agreement in Risk Prediction Between the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay (Oncotype DX®) and the PAM50 Breast Cancer Intrinsic Classifier™ in Early-Stage Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
    Kelly, Catherine M.
    Bernard, Philip S.
    Krishnamurthy, Savitri
    Wang, Bailiang
    Ebbert, Mark T. W.
    Bastien, Roy R. L.
    Boucher, Kenneth M.
    Young, Elliana
    Iwamoto, Takayuki
    Pusztai, Lajos
    ONCOLOGIST, 2012, 17 (04) : 492 - 498
  • [22] Tumor grade and progesterone receptor status predict 21-gene recurrence score in early stage invasive breast carcinoma
    Huang, Jing Li
    Kizy, Scott
    Marmor, Schelomo
    Altman, Ariella
    Blaes, Anne
    Beckwith, Heather
    Tuttle, Todd M.
    Hui, Jane Yuet Ching
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 172 (03) : 671 - 677
  • [23] Breast Carcinoma With an Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score &lt; 18: Rate of Distant Metastases in a Large Series With Clinical Follow-Up
    Wen, Hannah Y.
    Krystel-Whittemore, Melissa
    Patil, Sujata
    Pareja, Fresia
    Bowser, Zenica L.
    Dickler, Maura N.
    Norton, Larry
    Morrow, Monica
    Hudis, Clifford A.
    Brogi, Edi
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (01) : 131 - 137
  • [24] Distribution of the 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer in Germany
    Walter, Vincent P.
    Taran, Florin-Andrei
    Wallwiener, Markus
    Bauer, Armin
    Grischke, Eva-Maria
    Walter, Christina Barbara
    Hahn, Markus
    Brucker, Sara Y.
    Hartkopf, Andreas Daniel
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2020, 80 (06) : 619 - 627
  • [25] Distribution and influence of the 21-gene recurrence score on chemotherapy decision-making in special type of breast cancer
    Yu, Jing
    Wu, Jiayi
    Huang, Ou
    He, Jianrong
    Zhu, Li
    Chen, Weiguo
    Li, Yafen
    Chen, Xiaosong
    Shen, Kunwei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 11 (12): : 6188 - +
  • [26] Progesterone receptor status and tumor grade predict the 21-gene recurrence score of invasive lobular breast cancer
    Wu, San-Gang
    Zhang, Wen-Wen
    Wang, Jun
    Lian, Chen-Lu
    Sun, Jia-Yuan
    Chen, Yonq-Xionq
    He, Zhen-Yu
    BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 13 (12) : 1005 - 1012
  • [27] Breast carcinoma with 21-gene recurrence score lower than 18: rate of locoregional recurrence in a large series with clinical follow-up
    Turashvili, Gulisa
    Brogi, Edi
    Morrow, Monica
    Dickler, Maura
    Norton, Larry
    Hudis, Clifford
    Wen, Hannah Y.
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [28] 21-gene recurrence score and adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer
    Chen, Xiang-Hong
    Zhang, Wen-Wen
    Wang, Jun
    Sun, Jia-Yuan
    Li, Feng-Yan
    He, Zhen-Yu
    Wu, San-Gang
    BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 13 (02) : 83 - 93
  • [29] Clinical application of the 21-gene oncotype recurrence score in an older cohort: A single center experience
    Chiru, E. D.
    Kuhar, C. Grasic
    Oseledchyk, A.
    Schotzau, A.
    Gonzalez, M. J.
    Kurzeder, C.
    Vetter, M.
    TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 36
  • [30] Comparison of Oncotype DX With Modified Magee Equation Recurrence Scores in Low-Grade Invasive Carcinoma of Breast
    Hou, Yanjun
    Zynger, Debra L.
    Li, Xiaoxian
    Li, Zaibo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2017, 148 (02) : 167 - 172