Comparison between the antiemetic effects of palonosetron and granisetron in breast cancer patients treated with anthracycline-based regimens

被引:10
|
作者
Ohzawa, Hideyuki [1 ]
Miki, Atsushi [2 ]
Hozumi, Yasuo [1 ]
Miyazaki, Chieko [1 ]
Sagara, Yuka [1 ]
Tanaka, Yumiko [1 ]
Shiba, Satomi [1 ]
Joutoku, Hiromi [1 ]
Sakuragi, Masako [1 ]
Takehara, Megumi [1 ]
Sakuma, Yasunaru [2 ]
Nishimura, Wataru [3 ]
Fujii, Hirofumi [4 ]
Yasuda, Yoshikazu [2 ]
机构
[1] Jichi Med Univ, Dept Breast Surg, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 3290498, Japan
[2] Jichi Med Univ, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 3290498, Japan
[3] Natl Ctr Global Hlth & Med, Dept Metab Disorder, Diabet Res Ctr, Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo 1628655, Japan
[4] Jichi Med Univ, Dept Clin Oncol, Shimotsuke, Tochigi 3290498, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
palonosetron; granisetron; antiemetic therapy; CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED NAUSEA; ONCOLOGY-GROUP; VOMITING CINV;
D O I
10.3892/ol.2014.2640
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is a serious adverse side-effect of anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens, in patients with breast cancer. A combination of three drugs, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) receptor antagonist, aprepitant and dexamethasone, is recommended for antiemetic therapy. Palonosetron (PALO), a novel 5-HT3 receptor antagonist has been identified to be effective against delayed nausea and vomiting. In this study, the results of PALO for patients who received anthracycline-based chemotherapy were compared with that of granisetron (GRA) using a crossover study design. This study evaluated the efficacy of antiemetics in the first cycle of chemotherapy, as well as the second and third cycles. A total of 21 patients and 19 patients were assigned to PALO and GRA treatment groups during the first cycle of chemotherapy, respectively. The patients switched to the other antiemetic drug for the second chemotherapy cycle (PALO followed by GRA or GRA followed by PALO). The patients could select PALO or GRA antiemetics for the third cycle, according to their preference. A total of 21 patients selected PALO and 18 patients selected GRA in the third cycle, and one patient was withdrawn from the study as their third cycle questionnaire was not obtained. No significant differences between PALO and GRA were identified in first and second cycles. However, during the third cycle, a significant difference was observed in acute-phase complete control of emetic events between the PALO and GRA groups, which was defined as no emetic episode, no additional antiemetic treatment and no more than mild nausea, between PALO and GRA. These results demonstrated that changing antiemetics may affect the efficacy of antiemetics. This study indicates that alteration of antiemetic regimens, including drug combination and order, may improve the efficacy of antiemetic treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 124
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [41] Study protocol for a double-blind, comparative, randomised Japanese trial of triplet standard antiemetic therapies with or without 5 mg olanzapine to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting for patients with breast cancer treated with an anthracycline/cyclophosphamide regimen (JTOP-B)
    Ozeki, Rie
    Iihara, Hirotoshi
    Shimokawa, Mototsugu
    Hashimoto, Hironobu
    Abe, Masakazu
    Mukohara, Toru
    Bando, Hiroko
    Hayashi, Toshinobu
    Kawazoe, Hitoshi
    Komoda, Masayo
    Takahashi, Takako Yanai
    Saito, Mitsue
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [42] Palonosetron plus dexamethasone effectively prevents acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in pre-treated patients who have failed to respond to a previous antiemetic treatment: Comparison between elderly and non-elderly patient response
    Massa, Elena
    Astara, Giorgio
    Madeddu, Clelia
    Dessi, Mariele
    Loi, Carla
    Lepori, Stefano
    Mantovani, Giovanni
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2009, 70 (01) : 83 - 91
  • [43] Comparison of efficacy between palonosetron-midazolam combination and palonosetron alone for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing breast surgery and patient controlled analgesia A prospective, randomized, double-blind study: A CONSORT-compliant study
    Hong, Jeong-Min
    Han, Yun-Hee
    Lee, Dowon
    Hwang, Boo Young
    Baik, Jiseok
    Cho, Ah Reum
    Lee, Hyeon Jeong
    Kim, Eunsoo
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (26) : E26438
  • [44] Preliminary experience of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in breast cancer patients with brain metastases previously treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy
    Chira, Ciprian
    Jacob, Julian
    Derhem, Najib
    Bollet, Marc A.
    Campana, Francois
    Marchand, Virginie
    Pierga, Jean-Yves
    Fourquet, Alain
    Kirova, Youlia M.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2011, 105 (02) : 401 - 408
  • [45] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study of olanzapine-based prophylactic antiemetic therapy for delayed and persistent nausea and vomiting in patients with HER2-positive or HER2-low breast cancer treated with trastuzumab deruxtecan: ERICA study (WJOG14320B)
    Sakai, H.
    Tsurutani, J.
    Ozaki, Y.
    Ishiguro, H.
    Nozawa, K.
    Yamanaka, T.
    Aogi, K.
    Matsumoto, K.
    Iwasa, T.
    Tokiwa, M.
    Tsuneizumi, M.
    Miyoshi, Y.
    Kitagawa, C.
    Yamamoto, M.
    Takano, Y.
    Imamura, C. K.
    Chiba, Y.
    Takiguchi, D.
    Ezumi, T.
    Takano, T.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2025, 36 (01) : 31 - 42
  • [46] Comparison of platinum combination re-challenge therapy and docetaxel monotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients previously treated with platinum-based chemoradiotherapy
    Imai, Hisao
    Kaira, Kyoichi
    Mori, Keita
    Ono, Akira
    Akamatsu, Hiroaki
    Taira, Tetsuhiko
    Yoshino, Reiko
    Kenmotsu, Hirotsugu
    Saitoh, Jun-ichi
    Harada, Hideyuki
    Naito, Tateaki
    Murakami, Haruyasu
    Tomizawa, Yoshio
    Matsuura, Masana
    Saito, Ryusei
    Nakajima, Takashi
    Yamada, Masanobu
    Takahashi, Toshiaki
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2015, 4