Structural optimization based on CAD-CAE integration and metamodeling techniques

被引:131
作者
Park, Hong-Seok [1 ]
Dang, Xuan-Phuong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Lab Prod Engn, Sch Mech & Automot Engn, Ulsan 680749, South Korea
关键词
CAD-CAE integration; Structural optimization; Metamodeling techniques; Response surface methodology; Radial basis function; ENGINEERING DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; RADIAL BASIS FUNCTIONS; METAL-FORMING PROCESS; SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; OPTIMUM DESIGN; SYSTEM; CHALLENGES; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cad.2010.06.003
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Traditional structural optimization, which identifies the best combination of geometrical parameters to improve the product's performance and to save the material, is often carried out manually. This paper presents a framework that performs the integration between commercial CAD-CAE software by using common scripting, programming languages and Application Programming Interface. The loop of design-analysis-redesign in optimization process was done automatically and seamlessly without interaction with designer. Along with CAD-CAE computer-aided tools, metamodeling techniques including response surface methodology and radial basis function were applied to structural optimization according to the number of design variables. This approach reduces the time for solving computation-intensive design optimization problems and the designers are free from monotonous repetitive tasks. Three case studies were carried out in order to verify the feasibility and general-purpose characteristics of the proposed method for the structural optimization process of mechanical components. The results show that the proposed method facilitates the structural optimization process and reduces the computing cost compared to other approaches. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 902
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P 9 AIAA ISSMO S MUL
[2]  
Barton RR, 2006, HBK OPERAT RES MANAG, V13, P535, DOI 10.1016/S0927-0507(06)13018-2
[3]  
BIANCONI F, 2001, 12 ADM INT C IT SEPT
[4]  
Bonte MHA, 2008, STRUCT MULTIDISCIP O, V35, P571, DOI 10.1007/s00158-007-0206-3
[5]   Optimum design of a 1x2 mechanical optical switch [J].
Chung, TT ;
Lee, CC ;
Fan, KC .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2006, 31 (03) :229-240
[6]   Genetic algorithms and finite element coupling for mechanical optimization [J].
Corriveau, Guillaume ;
Guilbault, Raynald ;
Tahan, Antoine .
ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2010, 41 (03) :422-426
[7]   An open platform of shape design optimization for shell structure [J].
Dai, L. ;
Guan, Z. Q. ;
Chen, B. S. ;
Zhang, H. W. .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2008, 35 (06) :609-622
[8]   A CAD-CAE integrated injection molding design system [J].
Deng, YM ;
Lam, YC ;
Tor, SB ;
Britton, GA .
ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2002, 18 (01) :80-92
[9]   Shape optimization of heavy load carrying components for structural performance and manufacturing cost [J].
Edke, M. S. ;
Chang, K. H. .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2006, 31 (05) :344-354
[10]  
*ENG SOFTW INC, 2004, ISIGHT US GUID