Prompt gamma activation analysis for determining the elemental composition of archaeological ceramics

被引：2

作者：

Borzakov, S. B. M. ^{[1
,2
]}

Zhomartova, A. Zh ^{[1
,3
,4
]}

Dmitriev, A. Yu. ^{[1
]}

Koval, V. Yu. ^{[5
]}

Hramco, C. ^{[1
,6
]}

Badawy, Wael M. ^{[1
,7
]}

机构：

[1] Joint Inst Nucl Res, Frank Lab Neutron Phys, 6 Joliot Curie St, Dubna 141980, Russia

[2] Dubna State Univ, 19 Univ Skaya St, Dubna 141980, Russia

[3] LN Gumilyov Eurasian Natl Univ, 2 Satpayev St, Nur Sultan 010008, Kazakhstan

[4] Minist Energy Republ Kazakhstan, Inst Nucl Phys, 1Ibragimova St, Alma Ata 050032, Kazakhstan

[5] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Archeol, 19 Dm Ulyanova St, Moscow 117292, Russia

[6] Inst Chem Republ Moldova, 3 Acad, Kishinev, Moldova

[7] Egyptian Atom Energy Author, EAEA, Radiat Protect & Civil Def Dept, Nucl,Res Ctr, Abu Zaabal 13759, Egypt

来源：

APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES | 2022年 / 183卷

关键词：

Elemental composition; Archaeological ceramics; PGAA facility; Statistical analysis; PGAA; REACTOR; SAMPLES;

D O I：

10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110152

中图分类号：

O61 [无机化学];

学科分类号：

070301 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

The first experiments were carried out to study the elemental composition of archaeological ceramics using prompt gamma activation analysis (PGAA) at the pulsed reactor IBR-2, Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics (FLNP) -Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR). A radiation-resistant n-type High Purity Germanium (HPGe) detector was used to measure the radioactivity. The concentrations of 14 elements were determined namely; Al, C, Ca, Fe, Gd, H, K, Mn, Na, P, S, Si, Sm, and Ti. The obtained results were compared with those analyzed by other analytical techniques INAA (Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis) and portable X-ray fluorescence (XRF) for the same archaeological batches. The results revealed a good agreement within a range of 1-30%. These insights will contribute to the discussion of improving the PGAA installation and automation of the data obtained, which in turn will improve the quality of analysis and increase the number of determined elements. In this work results are presented, and the analytical merits are compared.

引用

页数：12

共 21 条

[1] CERAMIC GLAZE ANALYSIS BY SIMULTANEOUS IN-BEAM PGAA AND XRFS
ANDERSON, DL
[J]. JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY-ARTICLES, 1995, 192 (02): : 281 - 287
[2] Bakhmatova V.N., 2017, POVOLZHSKAYA ARKHEOL, V4, P126, DOI [10.24852/pa2017.4.22.126.146, DOI 10.24852/PA2017.4.22.126.146]
[3] Belanova T.S., 1986, CAPTURE HDB
[4] Prompt gamma activation analysis at the Budapest Research Reactor
Belgya, T.
[J]. GAMMA-1 EMISSION OF PROMPT GAMMA-RAYS IN FISSION AND RELATED TOPICS, 2012, 31 : 99 - 109
[5] Software for Calculation of Elements Mass Fractions in Investigated Samples by Absolute Method of Neutron Activation Analysis
Dmitriev, A. Yu
Borzakov, S. B.
[J]. PHYSICS OF PARTICLES AND NUCLEI LETTERS, 2019, 16 (06) : 772 - 778
[6] Automation of the quantitative determination of elemental content in samples using neutron activation analysis on the IBR-2 reactor at the frank laboratory for neutron physics, joint institute for nuclear research
Dmitriev A.Y.
Pavlov S.S.
[J]. Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters, 2013, 10 (1) : 33 - 36
[7] Firestone R., DATABASE PROMPT GAMM, DOI [10.2172/882898, DOI 10.2172/882898]
[8] Kasztovszky Z., 2011, P 37 INT S ARCH SPRI, P83
[9] A comparative study of PGAA and portable XRF used for non-destructive provenancing archaeological obsidian
Kasztovszky, Zsolt
Maroti, Boglarka
Harsanyi, Ildiko
Parkanyi, Denes
Szilagyi, Veronika
[J]. QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 468 : 179 - 189
[10] Khramchenkova R.K., 2014, POVOLZHSKAYA ARKHEOL, V2, P28, DOI [10.24852/pa2014.2.8.176.204, DOI 10.24852/PA2014.2.8.176.204]

← 1 2 3 →