Chlorhexidine Impregnated Central Venous Catheter Inducing an Anaphylatic Shock in the Intensive Care Unit

被引:21
作者
Khoo, A. [1 ]
Oziemski, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Epworth Med Fdn, Intens Care Unit, 89 Bridge Rd, Richmond, Vic 3121, Australia
关键词
Chlorhexidine; Anaphylaxis; Intensive care unit;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlc.2010.10.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Chlorhexidine, a bisbiguanide, is widely used as an antiseptic agent in medical practice as it has the greatest residual antimicrobial activity. Central venous catheters coated extraluminally with chlorhexidine have been made to reduce extraluminal contamination. By using both the chlorhexidine alchohol skin preparation and antimicrobial-coated catheters during vascular cannulation, it can reduce catheter related bloodstream significantly [1]. The reduction in infection rate is especially vital in critically ill patients who require long-term vascular access. Adverse reactions to chlorhexidine are rare and uncommon, and have been under-recognised as a cause of anaphylaxis. There are several reports of allergic reactions following exposure to chlorhexidine. We report of a case of anaphylaxis shock requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the placement of a chlorhexidine impregnated central venous catheters. (Heart, Lung and Circulation 2011;20:669-670) Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 670
页数:2
相关论文
共 7 条
[2]  
Beaudouin E, 2004, Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol, V36, P123
[3]  
Lim KS, 2008, ANAESTH INTENS CARE, V36, P502
[4]   HISTAMINE-RELEASE IN CONTACT URTICARIA [J].
NISHIOKA, K ;
DOI, T ;
KATAYAMA, I .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1984, 11 (03) :191-191
[5]   Anaphylactic shock induced by an antiseptic-coated central nervous catheter [J].
Oda, T ;
Hamasaki, J ;
Kanda, N ;
Mikami, K .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (05) :1242-1244
[6]   Two episodes of life-threatening anaphylaxis in the same patient to a chlorhexidine-sulphadiazine-coated central venous catheter [J].
Stephens, R ;
Mythen, M ;
Kallis, P ;
Davies, DWL ;
Egner, W ;
Rickards, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (02) :306-308
[7]   RETRACTED: Severe anaphylactic reaction due to a chlorhexidine-impregnated central venous catheter (Retracted Article) [J].
Terazawa, E ;
Shimonaka, H ;
Nagase, K ;
Masue, T ;
Dohi, S .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (05) :1296-1298