Novel Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Criteria and Interobserver Agreement for the Detection of Dysplasia in Barrett's Esophagus

被引:74
作者
Gaddam, Srinivas [1 ]
Mathur, Sharad C. [1 ,2 ]
Singh, Mandeep [1 ,2 ]
Arora, Jaya [2 ]
Wani, Sachin B. [1 ,2 ]
Gupta, Neil [1 ,2 ]
Overhiser, Andrew [2 ]
Rastogi, Amit [1 ,2 ]
Singh, Vikas [1 ]
Desai, Neel [1 ]
Hall, Sandra B. [2 ]
Bansal, Ajay [1 ,2 ]
Sharma, Prateek [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Kansas City, MO 64128 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Kansas City, KS USA
关键词
DIAGNOSIS; ADENOCARCINOMA; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1038/ajg.2011.294
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVES: Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) is an imaging technique that allows real-time in vivo histological assessment of Barrett's esophagus (BE). The objectives of this study were to create and test novel pCLE criteria for dysplastic BE (phase I), and to evaluate accuracy, interobserver variability, and learning curve in dysplasia prediction (phase II) using these criteria. METHODS: In phase I, using 50 pCLE videos, a pCLE expert and gastrointestinal pathologist formulated new BE criteria by consensus. These criteria were tested and refined in an independent set of 30 pCLE videos. In phase II, a formal training session for all assessors (three each experts/trainees) was conducted. Finally, using 75 testing videos, each video was interpreted as dysplasia (high-grade dysplasia (HGD)/cancer) vs. no dysplasia and the assessors' confidence in interpretation was noted. Interobserver agreement and accuracy (95% confidence interval (CI)) were determined for BE histology prediction. RESULTS: Of multiple pCLE criteria tested (phase I), only those with >= 70% sensitivity or specificity were included in the final set: epithelial surface: saw-toothed; cells: enlarged; cells: pleomorphic; glands: not equidistant; glands: unequal in size and shape; goblet cells: not easily identified. Overall accuracy in diagnosing dysplasia was 81.5% (95% CI: 77.5-81), with no difference between experts vs. non-experts. Accuracy of prediction was significantly higher when endoscopists were "confident" about their diagnosis (98% (95-99) vs. 62% (54-70), P < 0.001). Accuracy of dysplasia prediction for the first 30 videos was not different from the last 45 (93 vs. 81%, P = 0.51). Overall agreement of the criteria was substantial, kappa = 0.61 (0.53-0.69), with no difference between experts and non-experts. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the development and validation of new pCLE criteria for the prediction of HGD/cancer in BE patients. Using these criteria, this study demonstrated that overall accuracy in predicting dysplasia was high with substantial interobserver agreement. After a structured teaching session, accuracy and agreement between experienced and non-experienced observers was not different, suggesting a short learning curve.
引用
收藏
页码:1961 / 1969
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (01) :40-44
[2]   Poor Interobserver Agreement in the Distinction of High-Grade Dysplasia and Adenocarcinoma in Pretreatment Barrett's Esophagus Biopsies [J].
Downs-Kelly, Erinn ;
Mendelin, Joel E. ;
Bennett, Ana E. ;
Castilla, Elias ;
Henricks, Walter H. ;
Schoenfield, Lynn ;
Skacel, Marek ;
Yerian, Lisa ;
Rice, Thomas W. ;
Rybicki, Lisa A. ;
Bronner, Mary P. ;
Goldblum, John R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (09) :2333-2340
[3]   Biopsy surveillance is still necessary in patients with Barrett's oesophagus despite new endoscopic imaging techniques [J].
Egger, K ;
Werner, M ;
Meining, A ;
Ott, R ;
Allescher, HD ;
Höfler, H ;
Classen, M ;
Rösch, T .
GUT, 2003, 52 (01) :18-23
[4]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[5]   Reproducibility of the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett esophagus: A reaffirmation [J].
Montgomery, E ;
Bronner, MP ;
Goldblum, JR ;
Greenson, JK ;
Haber, MM ;
Hart, J ;
Lamps, LW ;
Lauwers, GY ;
Lazenby, AJ ;
Lewin, DN ;
Robert, ME ;
Toledano, AY ;
Shyr, Y ;
Washington, K .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2001, 32 (04) :368-378
[6]   Miniprobe confocal laser microscopy for the detection of invisible neoplasia in patients with Barrett's oesophagus [J].
Pohl, H. ;
Roesch, T. ;
Vieth, M. ;
Koch, M. ;
Becker, V. ;
Anders, M. ;
Khalifa, A. C. ;
Meining, A. .
GUT, 2008, 57 (12) :1648-1653
[7]   The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence [J].
Pohl, H ;
Welch, HG .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (02) :142-146
[8]   OBSERVER VARIATION IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF DYSPLASIA IN BARRETTS ESOPHAGUS [J].
REID, BJ ;
HAGGITT, RC ;
RUBIN, CE ;
ROTH, G ;
SURAWICZ, CM ;
VANBELLE, G ;
LEWIN, K ;
WEINSTEIN, WM ;
ANTONIOLI, DA ;
GOLDMAN, H ;
MACDONALD, W ;
OWEN, D .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1988, 19 (02) :166-178
[9]   BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS - CELL-CYCLE ABNORMALITIES IN ADVANCING STAGES OF NEOPLASTIC PROGRESSION [J].
REID, BJ ;
SANCHEZ, CA ;
BLOUNT, PL ;
LEVINE, DS .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 105 (01) :119-129
[10]   Optimizing endoscopic biopsy detection of early cancers in Barrett's high-grade dysplasia [J].
Reid, BJ ;
Blount, PL ;
Feng, ZD ;
Levine, DS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 95 (11) :3089-3096