Differences in quantitative methods for measuring subjective cognitive decline - results from a prospective memory clinic study

被引:25
|
作者
Vogel, Asmus [1 ]
Salem, Lise Cronberg [1 ]
Andersen, Birgitte Bo [1 ]
Waldemar, Gunhild [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Dept Neurol, Danish Dementia Res Ctr, DK-1168 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
subjective cognitive decline; subjective memory complaints; assessment; dementia; mild cognitive impairment; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; TEST-PERFORMANCE; COMPLAINTS; IMPAIRMENT; DEMENTIA; PREVALENCE; DEPRESSION; ASSOCIATION; STAGE;
D O I
10.1017/S1041610216000272
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background: Cognitive complaints occur frequently in elderly people and may be a risk factor for dementia and cognitive decline. Results from studies on subjective cognitive decline are difficult to compare due to variability in assessment methods, and little is known about how different methods influence reports of cognitive decline. Methods: The Subjective Memory Complaints Scale (SMC) and The Memory Complaint Questionnaire (MAC-Q) were applied in 121 mixed memory clinic patients with mild cognitive symptoms (mean MMSE = 26.8, SD 2.7). The scales were applied independently and raters were blinded to results from the other scale. Scales were not used for diagnostic classification. Cognitive performances and depressive symptoms were also rated. We studied the association between the two measures and investigated the scales' relation to depressive symptoms, age, and cognitive status. Results: SMC and MAC-Q were significantly associated (r = 0.44, N = 121, p = 0.015) and both scales had a wide range of scores. In this mixed cohort of patients, younger age was associated with higher SMC scores. There were no significant correlations between cognitive test performances and scales measuring subjective decline. Depression scores were significantly correlated to both scales measuring subjective decline. Linear regression models showed that age did not have a significant contribution to the variance in subjective memory beyond that of depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Measures for subjective cognitive decline are not interchangeable when used in memory clinics and the application of different scales in previous studies is an important factor as to why studies show variability in the association between subjective cognitive decline and background data and/or clinical results. Careful consideration should be taken as to which questions are relevant and have validity when operationalizing subjective cognitive decline.
引用
收藏
页码:1513 / 1520
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prospective Metamemory Monitoring of Episodic Visual Memory in Community-Dwelling Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline and Mild Cognitive Impairment
    Chi, Susan Y.
    Chua, Elizabeth F.
    Kieschnick, Dustin W.
    Rabin, Laura A.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 36 (08) : 1404 - 1425
  • [32] APOE ε4 Allele Distribution and Association With Scores of Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire 9 in a Large Chinese Memory Clinic Cohort
    Hao, Lixiao
    Jia, Jianguo
    Xing, Yue
    Han, Ying
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [33] Is the Discrimination of Subjective Cognitive Decline from Cognitively Healthy Adulthood and Mild Cognitive Impairment Possible? A Pilot Study Utilizing the R4Alz Battery
    Poptsi, Eleni
    Moraitou, Despina
    Tsardoulias, Emmanouil
    Symeonidis, Andreas L.
    Tsolaki, Magda
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2020, 77 (02) : 715 - 732
  • [34] Tau plasma levels in subjective cognitive decline: Results from the DELCODE study
    Mueller, Stephan
    Preische, Oliver
    Goepfert, Jens C.
    Yanez, Viviana A. Carcamo
    Joos, Thomas O.
    Boecker, Henning
    Duezel, Emrah
    Falkai, Peter
    Priller, Josef
    Buerger, Katharina
    Catak, Cihan
    Janowitz, Daniel
    Heneka, Michael T.
    Brosseron, Frederic
    Nestor, Peter
    Peters, Oliver
    Menne, Felix
    Schipke, Carola G.
    Schneider, Anja
    Spottke, Annika
    Fliessbach, Klaus
    Kilimann, Ingo
    Teipel, Stefan
    Wagner, Michael
    Wiltfang, Jens
    Jessen, Frank
    Laske, Christoph
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [35] Differences in Functional Brain Networks Between Subjective Cognitive Decline with and without Worry Groups: A Graph Theory Study from SILCODE
    Liu, Yi
    Li, Zhuoyuan
    Jiang, Xueyan
    Du, Wenying
    Wang, Xiaoqi
    Sheng, Can
    Jiang, Jiehui
    Han, Ying
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2021, 84 (03) : 1279 - 1289
  • [36] Anticholinergic drugs and functional, cognitive impairment and behavioral disturbances in patients from a memory clinic with subjective cognitive decline or neurocognitive disorders
    Dauphinot, Virginie
    Mouchoux, Christelle
    Veillard, Sebastien
    Delphin-Combe, Floriane
    Krolak-Salmon, Pierre
    ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH & THERAPY, 2017, 9
  • [37] Outcomes of stable and unstable patterns of subjective cognitive decline – results from the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged (LEILA75+)
    Susanne Roehr
    Arno Villringer
    Matthias C. Angermeyer
    Tobias Luck
    Steffi G. Riedel-Heller
    BMC Geriatrics, 16
  • [38] Characteristics of Subjective Cognitive Decline Associated with Alzheimer's Disease Amyloid Pathology: Findings from The CABLE Study
    Zhao, Yong-Li
    Ou, Ya-Nan
    Ma, Ya-Hui
    Tan, Lan
    Yu, Jin-Tai
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2023, 92 (02) : 581 - 590
  • [39] KIBRA T allele influences memory performance and progression of cognitive decline: a 7-year follow-up study in subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment
    Mazzeo, Salvatore
    Bessi, Valentina
    Padiglioni, Sonia
    Bagnoli, Silvia
    Bracco, Laura
    Sorbi, Sandro
    Nacmias, Benedetta
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 40 (08) : 1559 - 1566
  • [40] Subjective cognitive decline disrupts aspects of prospective memory in older adults with HIV disease
    Thompson, Jennifer L.
    Sheppard, David P.
    Matchanova, Anastasia
    Morgan, Erin E.
    Loft, Shayne
    Woods, Steven Paul
    AGING NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITION, 2023, 30 (04) : 582 - 600