The Effect of Telehealth Interventions on Quality of Life of Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:90
作者
Larson, Jamie L. [1 ]
Rosen, Adam B. [2 ]
Wilson, Fernando A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Adm, 984350 Nebraska Med Ctr, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Coll Educ, Sch Hlth & Kinesiol, Omaha, NE 68182 USA
关键词
telehealth; telemedicine; telepsychiatry; e-health; COLORECTAL FACT-C; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; TELEMENTAL HEALTH; THERAPY; FEASIBILITY; COMMUNICATION; SATISFACTION; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; DISTRESS;
D O I
10.1089/tmj.2017.0112
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction:In 2016, approximate to 1.7 million new cases of cancer were diagnosed. Cancer patients can have physical, functional, and psychosocial issues when dealing with cancer treatment. Telehealth has been effectively introduced to help deliver treatment to patients suffering from chronic disease; however, there is little consensus on its effectiveness in administering sociobehavioral cancer treatments. Thus, this study determines the benefits of telehealth-based interventions providing emotional and symptom support in improving quality of life (QOL) among cancer patients. Methods:Two researchers conducted comprehensive searches on PubMed, SCOPUS, Medline, PsycINFO, ERIC, Psychology and Behavioral Collection, and Medline Complete. Key search terms included telehealth or telemedicine and QOL and cancer. Articles were included if they assessed a telehealth-delivered intervention for adult cancer patients and provided a QOL assessment. Data were extracted to calculate mean effect sizes for QOL measures on the effectiveness of telehealth relative to usual care (UC) for cancer treatments.Results:Out of 414 articles identified in our initial search, nine articles fit our inclusion criteria. Both telehealth (Hedges g=0.211, p=0.016) and standard of care (Hedges g=0.217, p < 0.001) cancer treatment delivery methods demonstrated small, but statistically significant improvements in QOL measures. However, there were no statistically significant differences in effectiveness between the telehealth interventions and UC (p=0.76). Conclusions:The results indicate that telehealth interventions are as effective at improving QOL scores in patients undergoing cancer treatment as in-person UC. Further studies should be undertaken on different modalities of telehealth to determine its appropriate and effective use in interventions to improve the QOL for cancer patients undergoing treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 405
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Telemental health: A status update
    Aboujaoude, Elias
    Salame, Wael
    Naim, Lama
    [J]. WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 14 (02) : 223 - 230
  • [2] Patient Satisfaction with Physician-Patient Communication During Telemedicine
    Agha, Zia
    Schapira, Ralph M.
    Laud, Purushottam W.
    McNutt, Gail
    Roter, Debra L.
    [J]. TELEMEDICINE JOURNAL AND E-HEALTH, 2009, 15 (09): : 830 - 839
  • [3] Cancer Patients' Questions and Concerns Expressed in an Online Nurse-delivered Mail Service: Preliminary Results
    Andersen, Trine
    Ruland, Cornelia M.
    [J]. CONNECTING HEALTH AND HUMANS, 2009, 146 : 149 - +
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, Cancer statistics
  • [5] Access to cancer services for rural colorectal cancer patients
    Baldwin, Laura-Mae
    Cai, Yong
    Larson, Eric H.
    Dobie, Sharon A.
    Wright, George E.
    Goodman, David C.
    Matthews, Barbara
    Hart, L. Gary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 2008, 24 (04) : 390 - 399
  • [6] Electronic Self-Report Assessment for Cancer and Self-Care Support: Results of a Multicenter Randomized Trial
    Berry, Donna L.
    Hong, Fangxin
    Halpenny, Barbara
    Partridge, Ann H.
    Fann, Jesse R.
    Wolpin, Seth
    Lober, William B.
    Bush, Nigel E.
    Parvathaneni, Upendra
    Back, Anthony L.
    Amtmann, Dagmar
    Ford, Rosemary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (03) : 199 - +
  • [7] Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument
    Brady, MJ
    Cella, DF
    Mo, F
    Bonomi, AE
    Tulsky, DS
    Lloyd, SR
    Deasy, S
    Cobleigh, M
    Shiomoto, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (03) : 974 - 986
  • [8] THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE
    CELLA, DF
    TULSKY, DS
    GRAY, G
    SARAFIAN, B
    LINN, E
    BONOMI, A
    SILBERMAN, M
    YELLEN, SB
    WINICOUR, P
    BRANNON, J
    ECKBERG, K
    LLOYD, S
    PURL, S
    BLENDOWSKI, C
    GOODMAN, M
    BARNICLE, M
    STEWART, I
    MCHALE, M
    BONOMI, P
    KAPLAN, E
    TAYLOR, S
    THOMAS, CR
    HARRIS, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) : 570 - 579
  • [9] Feasibility and Acceptability of Clinic-Based Telepsychiatry for Low-Income Hispanic Primary Care Patients
    Chong, Jenny
    Moreno, Francisco
    [J]. TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2012, 18 (04) : 297 - 304
  • [10] Remote patient-provider communication and quality of life: empirical test of a dialogic model of cancer care
    Chumbler, Neale R.
    Mkanta, William N.
    Richardson, Lisa C.
    Harris, Linda
    Darkins, Adam
    Kobb, Rita
    Ryan, Patricia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2007, 13 (01) : 20 - 25