The effect of unethical behavior and learning on strategic supplier selection

被引:18
作者
Chen, Jen-Yi [1 ]
Saddam, Swathi R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland State Univ, Dept Operat & Supply Chain Management, Monte Ahuja Coll Business, Cleveland, OH 44115 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Dept Management & Mkt, Doermer Sch Business, Ft Wayne, IN 46805 USA
关键词
Social responsibility; Contracting; Supplier selection; RISK-MANAGEMENT; CONSUMERS; PAY; MANUFACTURER; CAPABILITIES; CHAINS; MODEL; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.003
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The unethical behavior of suppliers, such as the use of child labor or the use of unsafe processes, is becoming an increasingly common problem in many industries. Despite lower sourcing costs, such social irresponsibility can have a severe negative effect on firms because of growing awareness and punishment from consumers toward unethical practices. To study how ethical behavior of suppliers and supplier learning affect a firm's sourcing strategy, we analyze a buying firm's strategic sourcing decision on supplier selection between unethical and ethical suppliers by considering the risk likelihood and the impact to the firm of unethical events, and the supplier learning. We show that supplier learning matters and that the benefit of high learning rates may outweigh the concerns of unethical behavior or high ethical sourcing cost and so, long-term contracts are optimal. We also show that the firm may prefer a selection policy contingent on the realization of unethical events only when risk is low or impact is high. In addition, we show that a changing environment may cause the firm to take a more proactive sourcing strategy by adopting short-term switching policies. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 87
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [11] One strike and you're out: Qualitative insights into the formation of consumers' ethical company or brand perceptions
    Brunk, Katja H.
    Blumelhuber, Christian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2011, 64 (02) : 134 - 141
  • [12] Burkitt L., 2014, WALL STR J 0413
  • [13] Bustillo M., 2012, WALL STR J 1129
  • [14] Butner Karen, 2010, Strategy & Leadership, V38, P22, DOI 10.1108/10878571011009859
  • [15] Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions
    Carter, Craig R.
    Easton, P. Liane
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 41 (01) : 46 - 62
  • [16] Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach
    Chan, Felix T. S.
    Kumar, N.
    Tiwari, M. K.
    Lau, H. C. W.
    Choy, K. L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (14) : 3825 - 3857
  • [17] A four-phase AHP-QFD approach for supplier assessment: a sustainability perspective
    Dai, Jing
    Blackhurst, Jennifer
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2012, 50 (19) : 5474 - 5490
  • [18] Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee
    De Pelsmacker, P
    Driesen, L
    Rayp, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, 2005, 39 (02) : 363 - 385
  • [19] Dou E., 2013, WALL STR J 0529
  • [20] Elkington J., 1997, Cannibals with forks : the triple bottom line of 21 st century business, DOI DOI 10.1002/TQEM.3310080106