A MATCHED-CASE COMPARISON TO EXPLORE THE ROLE OF CONSOLIDATION CHEMOTHERAPY AFTER CONCURRENT CHEMORADIATION IN CERVICAL CANCER

被引:42
作者
Choi, Chel Hun [1 ]
Lee, Yoo-Young [1 ]
Kim, Min Kyu [1 ]
Kim, Tae-Joong [1 ]
Lee, Jeong-Won [1 ]
Nam, Hee Rim [2 ]
Huh, Seung Jae [2 ]
Lee, Je-Ho [1 ]
Bae, Duk-Soo [1 ]
Kim, Byoung-Gie [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul 135710, South Korea
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2011年 / 81卷 / 05期
关键词
Locally advanced cervical carcinoma; Concurrent chemoradiation; Consolidation chemotherapy; Matched-case comparison; Cervical cancer; RADIATION-THERAPY; UTERINE CERVIX; PHASE-II; CISPLATIN; CARCINOMA; RADIOTHERAPY; IFOSFAMIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.2006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) and CCRT alone in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Methods and Materials: Using medical records from January 2001 to December 2007,39 patients treated with consolidation chemotherapy after CCRT (Group 1) were matched to 39 patients treated with CCRT alone (Group 2). Consolidation chemotherapy consisted of three additional cycles of chemotherapy with cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) (Day 1) and 5-fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m(2) per day (Days 1-5) given every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results: During a median follow-up period of 35 months (range, 8-96 months), 10(25.6%) and 16(41.0%) patients showed disease progression in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Distant recurrence with or without locoregional/lymphogenous recurrence occurred more frequently in Group 2 than in Group 1 (23.1% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.06). By contreast, there was no difference in locoregional or lymphogenous recurrence between the two groups. The rate of overall survival was higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (92.7% vs. 69.9%, p = 0.042), whereas the difference in progression-free survival between the groups was not statistically significant (70.1% vs. 55.1%, p = 0.079). Although the difference was not statistically significant, neutropenia was more common in Group 1 than in Group 2 (10.9% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.07). Conclusions: Consolidation chemotherapy after CCRT may improve survival and reduce distant recurrence without additional toxicity compared to CCRT alone in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1252 / 1257
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Candelaria Myrna, 2006, Int Semin Surg Oncol, V3, P3, DOI 10.1186/1477-7800-3-3
[2]   Salvage chemotherapy with a combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin for the patients with recurrent carcinoma of the uterine cervix [J].
Choi, C. H. ;
Kim, T. -J. ;
Leey, S. -J. ;
Lee, J. -W. ;
Kim, B. -G. ;
Lee, J. -H. ;
Bae, D. -S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2006, 16 (03) :1157-1164
[3]   Phase II study of consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation in cervical cancer: Preliminary results [J].
Choi, Chel Hun ;
Lee, Jeong-Won ;
Kim, Tae-Joong ;
Kim, Woo Young ;
Nam, Hee Rim ;
Kim, Byoung-Gie ;
Huh, Seung Jae ;
Lee, Je-Ho ;
Bae, Duk-Soo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (03) :817-822
[4]  
Choi Il Jung, 2008, J Gynecol Oncol, V19, P129, DOI 10.3802/jgo.2008.19.2.129
[5]   Extended-field radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy with concurrent and adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a phase I/II study [J].
Chung, YL ;
Jian, JJM ;
Cheng, SH ;
Hsieh, CI ;
Tan, TD ;
Chang, HJ ;
Hung, CF ;
Horng, CF ;
Soong, T ;
Tsou, MH .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 97 (01) :126-135
[6]  
DUENASGONZALEZ A, 2009 ASCO ANN M
[7]   CERVICAL-CANCER - SERIAL MR IMAGING BEFORE AND AFTER PRIMARY RADIATION-THERAPY - A 2-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-STUDY [J].
FLUECKIGER, F ;
EBNER, F ;
POSCHAUKO, H ;
TAMUSSINO, K ;
EINSPIELER, R ;
RANNER, G .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (01) :89-93
[8]   Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of radiotherapy on cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Hatano, K ;
Sekiya, Y ;
Araki, H ;
Sakai, M ;
Togawa, T ;
Narita, Y ;
Akiyama, Y ;
Kimura, S ;
Ito, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (03) :639-644
[9]  
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 1985, 38 INT COMM RAD UN M
[10]   Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma [J].
Keys, HM ;
Bundy, BN ;
Stehman, FB ;
Muderspach, LI ;
Chafe, WE ;
Suggs, CL ;
Walker, JL ;
Gersell, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (15) :1154-1161