REVIEW OF EVALUATION OF QUALITY OF DISTANCE LEARNING COURSES: STANDARDS, CRITERIA AND METHODS

被引:0
作者
Vinogradova, I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Vilnius, Lithuania
来源
11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI2018) | 2018年
关键词
distance learning courses; evaluation of quality; MCDM; quality standards; criteria; methods; FUZZY AHP METHODOLOGY; ADAPTATION QUALITY; REUSABILITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The main aim of this paper is to review, analyse and present distance learning courses (DLC) quality evaluation problem and possible methods, standards and principles of identifying quality criteria. Usually, DLC quality evaluation is performed by experts in the relevant area. High-quality education is important for cultural, social, and economic development of the society as well as for business and industry, and future development of science. Possibility to learn at a convenient time and place has determined the emergence of a new form of distance studies DLC, hence the relevance of the topic. The diversity of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) and their application to e-studies do not in themselves determine the effectiveness of studies process. The quality of distance learning course depends on several factors such as clearly and interestingly presented learning material, well organised learning process, usage of suitable ICTs, relevance of DLC material, students' motivation, teachers' qualification and professionalism, etc. An educational institution follows its own quality criteria formulated, or evaluates DLC intuitively. In any case, there are common principles and standards for quality criteria. There is also experience of quality evaluation of e-courses applying different methods including Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods, using experts' identified values according to provided quality criteria as well as the weights (i.e. importance) of the DLC quality criteria, Bayesian approach.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 390
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [11] Employing self-assessment, journaling, and peer sharing to enhance learning from an online course
    Hwang, Wu-Yuin
    Hsu, Jung-Lung
    Shadiev, Rustam
    Chang, Chia-Ling
    Huang, Yueh-Min
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2015, 27 (02) : 114 - 133
  • [12] On Personalised Learning Units Evaluation Methodology
    Kurilova, Julija
    Minkevicius, Saulius
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES (ICIST 2017), 2017, 756 : 487 - 498
  • [13] Kurilovas E., 2011, P 10 EUR C E LEARN E
  • [14] Kurilovas E, 2016, INT J ENG EDUC, V32, P1618
  • [15] Kurilovas E, 2016, INT J ENG EDUC, V32, P1596
  • [16] Evaluation of quality and personalisation of VR/AR/MR learning systems
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 35 (11) : 998 - 1007
  • [17] NEW MCEQLS FUZZY AHP METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING LEARNING REPOSITORIES: A TOOL FOR TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    Vinogradova, Irina
    Kubilinskiene, Svetlana
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2016, 22 (01) : 142 - 155
  • [18] Kurilovas E, 2014, J UNIVERS COMPUT SCI, V20, P1418
  • [19] NEW MCEQLS TFN METHOD FOR EVALUATING QUALITY AND REUSABILITY OF LEARNING OBJECTS
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    Serikoviene, Silvija
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2013, 19 (04) : 706 - 723
  • [20] Expert centred vs learner centred approach for evaluating quality and reusability of learning objects
    Kurilovas, Eugenijus
    Serikoviene, Silvija
    Vuorikari, Riina
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2014, 30 : 526 - 534