Mental workload during brain-computer interface training

被引:38
|
作者
Felton, Elizabeth A. [2 ]
Williams, Justin C. [1 ]
Vanderheiden, Gregg C. [1 ]
Radwin, Robert G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Biomed Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
brain-computer interface (BCI); mental workload; NASA Task Load Index; NASA-TLX; Fitts' law; electroencephalogram (EEG); DASHER;
D O I
10.1080/00140139.2012.662526
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
It is not well understood how people perceive the difficulty of performing brain-computer interface (BCI) tasks, which specific aspects of mental workload contribute the most, and whether there is a difference in perceived workload between participants who are able-bodied and disabled. This study evaluated mental workload using the NASA Task Load Index (TLX), a multi-dimensional rating procedure with six subscales: Mental Demands, Physical Demands, Temporal Demands, Performance, Effort, and Frustration. Able-bodied and motor disabled participants completed the survey after performing EEG-based BCI Fitts' law target acquisition and phrase spelling tasks. The NASA-TLX scores were similar for able-bodied and disabled participants. For example, overall workload scores (range 0-100) for 1D horizontal tasks were 48.5 (SD = 17.7) and 46.6 (SD 10.3), respectively. The TLX can be used to inform the design of BCIs that will have greater usability by evaluating subjective workload between BCI tasks, participant groups, and control modalities. Practitioner Summary: Mental workload of brain-computer interfaces (BCI) can be evaluated with the NASA Task Load Index (TLX). The TLX is an effective tool for comparing subjective workload between BCI tasks, participant groups (able-bodied and disabled), and control modalities. The data can inform the design of BCIs that will have greater usability.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 537
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Neurofeedback Training of Alpha Relative Power Improves the Performance of Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface
    Zhou, Qing
    Cheng, Ruidong
    Yao, Lin
    Ye, Xiangming
    Xu, Kedi
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [32] A Review of Brain-Computer Interface Technology
    Stankevich, Philipp
    Spitsyn, Vladimir
    2015 INTERNATIONAL SIBERIAN CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS (SIBCON), 2015,
  • [33] Characterization of phase space trajectories for Brain-Computer Interface
    Sayed, Khaled
    Kamel, Mahmoud
    Alhaddad, Mohammed
    Malibary, Hussein M.
    Kadah, Yasser M.
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2017, 38 : 55 - 66
  • [34] Brain-Computer Interface Spellers: A Review
    Rezeika, Aya
    Benda, Mihaly
    Stawicki, Piotr
    Gembler, Felix
    Saboor, Abdul
    Volosyak, Ivan
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2018, 8 (04)
  • [35] An Improved Stimuli System for Brain-Computer Interface Applications
    Nicolae, Irina-Emilia
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS, COMPUTERS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ECAI), 2013,
  • [36] Psychometric Evaluation with Brain-Computer Interface
    Perego, Paolo
    Turconi, Anna Carla
    Gagliardi, Chiara
    Andreoni, Giuseppe
    HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT APPROACHES, PT I, 2011, 6761 : 406 - 413
  • [37] Motor Priming as a Brain-Computer Interface
    Stewart, Tom
    Hoshino, Kiyoshi
    Cichocki, Andrzej
    Rutkowski, Tomasz M.
    NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING, ICONIP 2016, PT II, 2016, 9948 : 538 - 545
  • [38] Driver Detecting System based on Brain-Computer Interface
    Hu Jian-feng
    Mu Zhen-dong
    Wang Ping
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, MANAGEMENT, INFORMATION AND MEDICINE (EMIM 2015), 2015, 8 : 512 - 515
  • [39] A P300 auditory brain-computer interface based on mental repetition
    Marassi, Alessandro
    Budai, Riccardo
    Chittaro, Luca
    BIOMEDICAL PHYSICS & ENGINEERING EXPRESS, 2018, 4 (03):
  • [40] Neurofeedback-based motor imagery training for brain-computer interface (BCI)
    Hwang, Han-Jeong
    Kwon, Kiwoon
    Im, Chang-Hwang
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2009, 179 (01) : 150 - 156