Software Model Checking Using Languages of Nested Trees

被引:17
|
作者
Alur, Rajeev [1 ]
Chaudhuri, Swarat [2 ]
Madhusudan, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Rice Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Champaign, IL 61802 USA
来源
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND SYSTEMS | 2011年 / 33卷 / 05期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Algorithms; Theory; Verification; Logic; specification; verification; mu-calculus; infinite-state; model-checking; games; pushdown systems; interprocedural analysis; TEMPORAL LOGIC;
D O I
10.1145/2039346.2039347
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
While model checking of pushdown systems is by now an established technique in software verification, temporal logics and automata traditionally used in this area are unattractive on two counts. First, logics and automata traditionally used in model checking cannot express requirements such as pre/post-conditions that are basic to analysis of software. Second, unlike in the finite-state world, where the mu-calculus has a symbolic model-checking algorithm and serves as an "assembly language" to which temporal logics can be compiled, there is no common formalism-either fixpoint-based or automata-theoretic-to model-check requirements on pushdown models. In this article, we introduce a new theory of temporal logics and automata that addresses the above issues, and provides a unified foundation for the verification of pushdown systems. The key idea here is to view a program as a generator of structures known as nested trees as opposed to trees. A fixpoint logic (called NT-mu) and a class of automata (called nested tree automata) interpreted on languages of these structures are now defined, and branching-time model-checking is phrased as language inclusion and membership problems for these languages. We show that NT-mu and nested tree automata allow the specification of a new frontier of requirements usable in software verification. At the same time, their model checking problem has the same worst-case complexity as their traditional analogs, and can be solved symbolically using a fixpoint computation that generalizes, and includes as a special case, "summary"-based computations traditionally used in interprocedural program analysis. We also show that our logics and automata define a robust class of languages-in particular, just as the mu-calculus is equivalent to alternating parity automata on trees, NT-mu is equivalent to alternating parity automata on nested trees. Categories and Subject Descriptors: D. 2.4 [Software Engineering]: Software/Program Verification-Model checking; F. 1.1 [Computation by abstract devices]: Models of computation-Automata; F. 3.1 [Theory of Computation]: Specifying and Verifying and Reasoning about Programs; F. 4.1 [Theory of Computation]: Mathematical Logic-Temporal logic
引用
收藏
页数:45
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Making CEGAR More Efficient in Software Model Checking
    Tian, Cong
    Duan, Zhenhua
    Duan, Zhao
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2014, 40 (12) : 1206 - 1223
  • [22] Model Checking for Verification of Quantum Circuits
    Ying, Mingsheng
    FORMAL METHODS, FM 2021, 2021, 13047 : 23 - 39
  • [23] Dynamic partial-order reduction for model checking software
    Flanagan, C
    Godefroid, P
    ACM SIGPLAN NOTICES, 2005, 40 (01) : 110 - 121
  • [24] PARAMETERIZED REACHABILITY GRAPH FOR SOFTWARE MODEL CHECKING BASED ON PDNET
    Jia, Xiangyu
    Li, Shuo
    COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS, 2023, 42 (04) : 781 - 804
  • [25] SMT-Based Symbolic Model-Checking for Operator Precedence Languages
    Chiari, Michele
    Geatti, Luca
    Gigante, Nicola
    Pradella, Matteo
    COMPUTER AIDED VERIFICATION, PT I, CAV 2024, 2024, 14681 : 387 - 408
  • [26] Supporting automated containment checking of software behavioural models using model transformations and model checking
    Muram, Faiz U. L.
    Tran, Huy
    Zdun, Uwe
    SCIENCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, 2019, 174 : 38 - 71
  • [27] Model checking agent programming languages
    Dennis, Louise A.
    Fisher, Michael
    Webster, Matthew P.
    Bordini, Rafael H.
    AUTOMATED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2012, 19 (01) : 5 - 63
  • [28] Model checking agent programming languages
    Louise A. Dennis
    Michael Fisher
    Matthew P. Webster
    Rafael H. Bordini
    Automated Software Engineering, 2012, 19 : 5 - 63
  • [29] Cut Set Analysis using Behavior Trees and model checking
    Lindsay, Peter A.
    Yatapanage, Nisansala
    Winter, Kirsten
    FORMAL ASPECTS OF COMPUTING, 2012, 24 (02) : 249 - 266
  • [30] Compositional model checking of software product lines using variation point obligations
    Liu, Jing
    Basu, Samik
    Lutz, Robyn R.
    AUTOMATED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2011, 18 (01) : 39 - 76