The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades' evidence

被引:1269
作者
Pornpitakpan, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ Malaysia, Sch Business, Petaling Jaya 46150, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper reviews the empirical evidence of the effect of credibility of the message source on persuasion over a span of 5 decades, primarily to come up with recommendations for practitioners as to when to use a high- or a low-credibility source and secondarily to identify areas for future research. The main effect studies of source credibility on persuasion seem to indicate the superiority of a high-credibility source over a low-credibility one. Interaction effect studies, however, show source credibility to be a liability under certain conditions. The variables found to interact with source credibility are categorized into 5 categories: source, message, channel, receiver, and destination variables. The most heavily researched variables have been the message and receiver variables. Implications for marketers/advertisers and suggestions for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 281
页数:39
相关论文
共 154 条
[1]   THE EFFECTS OF SOURCE CREDIBILITY AND PERFORMANCE RATING DISCREPANCY ON REACTIONS TO MULTIPLE RATERS [J].
ALBRIGHT, MD ;
LEVY, PE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 25 (07) :577-600
[2]   EFFECTS OF MEDIA, COMMUNICATOR, AND MESSAGE POSITION ON ATTITUDE-CHANGE [J].
ANDREOLI, V ;
WORCHEL, S .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1978, 42 (01) :59-70
[3]  
Andrews JC., 1990, Psychology Marketing, V7, P195, DOI DOI 10.1002/MAR.4220070305
[4]  
[Anonymous], THESIS HARVARD U CAM
[5]   DIMENSIONS OF SOURCE CREDIBILITY - TEST FOR REPRODUCIBILITY [J].
APPLBAUM, RL ;
ANATOL, KWE .
SPEECH MONOGRAPHS, 1973, 40 (03) :231-237
[6]   COMMUNICATOR CREDIBILITY AND COMMUNICATION DISCREPANCY AS DETERMINANTS OF OPINION CHANGE [J].
ARONSON, E ;
TURNER, JA ;
CARLSMITH, JM .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1963, 67 (01) :31-&
[9]  
BERLO DK, 1969, PUBLIC OPIN QUART, V33, P563, DOI 10.1086/267745
[10]   SOURCE EVALUATION, SYLLOGISTIC CONTENT, AND JUDGMENTS OF LOGICAL VALIDITY BY HIGH-DOGMATIC AND LOW-DOGMATIC PERSONS [J].
BETTINGHAUS, E ;
MILLER, G ;
STEINFATT, T .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 16 (02) :238-+