Exploratory Analysis of Different Metaheuristic Optimization Methods for Medical Image Enhancement

被引:7
作者
Oloyede, Muhtahir O. [1 ]
Onumanyi, Adeiza J. [2 ]
Bello-Salau, Habeeb [3 ]
Djouani, Karim [1 ,4 ]
Kurien, Anish [1 ]
机构
[1] Tshwane Univ Technol, F SATI Dept Elect Engn, ZA-0183 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Council Sci & Ind Res CSIR, Next Generat Enterprises & Inst, Adv Internet Things, ZA-0001 Pretoria, South Africa
[3] Ahmadu Bello Univ, Dept Comp Engn, Zaria 810211, Nigeria
[4] Univ Paris Est Creteil UPEC, Lab Images Signaux & Syst Intelligents LiSSi, F-94000 Creteil, France
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Biomedical imaging; Measurement; Image enhancement; Image edge detection; Linear programming; Genetic algorithms; Timing; Comparison; images; metaheuristic; optimization; performance; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3158324
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Metaheuristic optimization algorithms (MOAs) are popularly deployed for medical image enhancement (MIE) purposes. However, with an ever-increasing rate of newer MOAs being proposed in the literature, the question arises as to whether there exist any significant advantage(s) among these different MOAs, particularly as it pertains to MIE. In this paper, we explore this question by analyzing nine well-known MOAs for MIE, namely the artificial bee colony, cuckoo search, differential evolution, firefly, genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization (PSO), covariance matrix adaptive evolutionary strategy (CMAES), whale optimization algorithm (WOA), and the grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithms. First, instead of measuring an MOA's performance based on the number of generations, we adopted the fitness computation rate (FCR), which enables MOAs to be compared in a fairer sense. Secondly, we used a combination of a well-known transformation function and a robust evaluation function as our objective function in the MOAs considered in our study. Then, medical images were obtained from the Medpix database with representative samples selected from across the different parts of the body for MIE evaluation purposes. Within the constraints of the datasets used, the results indicate that, while the GWO and WOA algorithms performed slightly better empirically than the other methods over an average of 1000 Monte Carlo trials, there was little/no statistical significant difference between the other methods. The timing performance also demonstrates that there was no significant difference in the real-time processing speeds of the various MOAs, particularly when evaluated under the same FCR. As a consequence, preliminary findings from our study suggest that employing a range of past and current MOAs or proposing newer MOAs for MIE may not necessarily guarantee substantial comparative enhancement benefits. This might suggest that under high FCR levels, any MOA can be utilized for MIE.
引用
收藏
页码:28014 / 28036
页数:23
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   Unimodal and Multimodal Biometric Sensing Systems: A Review [J].
Oloyede, Muhtahir O. ;
Hancke, Gerhard P. .
IEEE ACCESS, 2016, 4 :7532-7555
[22]   Sustainable tire closed-loop supply chain network design: Hybrid metaheuristic algorithms for large-scale networks [J].
Sahebjamnia, Navid ;
Fathollahi-Fard, Amir Mohammad ;
Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Mostafa .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 196 :273-296
[23]  
Salem N., 2019, PROCEDIA COMPUT SCI, V163, P300, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.PROCS.2019.12.112, 10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.112]
[24]   A Sine-Cosine Optimizer-Based Gamma Corrected Adaptive Fractional Differential Masking for Satellite Image Enhancement [J].
Singh, Himanshu ;
Kumar, Anil ;
Balyan, L. K. .
HARMONY SEARCH AND NATURE INSPIRED OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS, 2019, 741 :633-645
[25]   Fractional-Order Integration Based Fusion Model for Piecewise Gamma Correction Along With Textural Improvement for Satellite Images [J].
Singh, Himanshu ;
Kumar, Anil ;
Balyan, L. K. ;
Lee, Heung-No .
IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 :37192-37210
[26]   GECCO Black-Box Optimization Competitions: Progress from 2009 to 2018 [J].
Skvorc, Urban ;
Eftimov, Tome ;
Korosec, Peter .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION (GECCCO'19 COMPANION), 2019, :275-276
[27]   Differential evolution - A simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces [J].
Storn, R ;
Price, K .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION, 1997, 11 (04) :341-359
[28]   Fuzzy contextual inference system for medical image enhancement [J].
Subramani, Bharath ;
Veluchamy, Magudeeswaran .
MEASUREMENT, 2019, 148
[29]   Automatic Classification and Retrieval of Brain Hemorrhages [J].
Tong, Hau Lee ;
Fauzi, Mohammad Faizal Ahmad ;
Haw, Su Cheng ;
Ng, Hu ;
Yap, Timothy Tzen Vun .
COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 481 :1-11
[30]   Parameter tuning with Chess Rating System (CRS-Tuning) for meta-heuristic algorithms [J].
Vecek, Niki ;
Mernik, Marjan ;
Filipic, Bogdan ;
Crepinsek, Matej .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 372 :446-469