Evaluation of salivary gland function after treatment of head-and-neck tumors with intensity-modulated radiotherapy by quantitative pertechnetate scintigraphy

被引:129
作者
Münter, MW
Karger, CP
Hoffner, SG
Hof, H
Thilmann, C
Rudat, V
Nill, S
Wannenmacher, M
Debus, J
机构
[1] German Canc Res Ctr, DKFZ, Dept E050, Clin Cooperat Unit, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] German Canc Res Ctr, DKFZ, Dept Med Phys, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Hamburg, Dept Radiat Radiol, Hamburg, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Nucl Med, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] Heidelberg Univ, Dept Clin Radiol, Heidelberg, Germany
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2004年 / 58卷 / 01期
关键词
inverse treatment planning; IMRT; quantitative; radiotherapy; salivary gland; scintigraphy; xerostomia;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(03)01437-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate salivary gland function after inversely planned stereotactic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for tumors of the head-and-neck region using quantitative pertechnetate scintigraphy. Methods and Materials: Since January 2000, 18 patients undergoing IMRT for cancer of the head and neck underwent pre- and posttherapeutic scintigraphy to examine salivary gland function. The mean dose to the primary planning target volume was 61.5 Gy (range 50.4-73.2), and the median follow-up was 23 months. In all cases, the parotid glands were directly adjacent to the planning target volume. The treatment planning goal was for at least one parotid gland to receive a mean dose of <26 Gy. Two quantitative parameters (change in maximal uptake and change in the relative excretion rate before and after IMRT) characterizing the change in salivary gland function after radiotherapy were determined. These parameters were compared with respect to the dose thresholds of 26 and 30 Gy for the mean dose. In addition, dose-response curves were calculated. Results: Using IMRT, it was possible in 16 patients to reduce the dose for at least one parotid gland to :526 Gy. In 7 patients, protection of both parotid glands was possible. No recurrent disease adjacent to the protected parotid glands was observed. Using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer scoring system, only 3 patients had Grade 2 xerostomia. No greater toxicity was seen for the salivary glands. The change in the relative excretion rate was significantly greater, if the parotid glands received a mean dose of greater than or equal to26 Gy or greater than or equal to30 Gy. For the change in maximal uptake, a statistically significant difference was seen only for the parotid glands and a dose threshold of 30 Gy. For the end point of a reduction in the parotid excretion rate of >50% and 75%, the dose-response curves yielded a dose at 50% complication probability of 34.8 +/- 3.6 and 40.8 +/- 5.3 Gy, respectively. Conclusion: Using IMRT, it is possible to protect the parotid glands and reduce the incidence and severity of xerostomia in patients. Doses <26-30 Gy significantly preserve salivary gland function. The results support the hypothesis that application of IMRT does not lead to increased local failure rates. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 184
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Prospective investigation and literature review of tolerance dose on salivary glands using quantitative salivary gland scintigraphy in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era [J].
Lee, Sea-Won ;
Kang, Keon Wook ;
Wu, Hong-Gyun .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2016, 38 :E1746-E1755
[32]   Assessment and Prediction of Salivary Gland Function After Head and Neck Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review [J].
Le Guevelou, J. ;
Palard-Novello, X. ;
Kammerer, E. ;
Baty, M. ;
Perazzi, M. ;
Larnaudie, A. ;
De Crevoisier, R. ;
Castelli, J. .
CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (24)
[33]   Incidence of xerostomia in locally advanced head-and-neck cancers in elderly patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy [J].
Jain, Neeraj ;
Jain, Sakshi ;
Kaur, Amandeep ;
Sachdeva, Kanchan ;
Sharma, Ramita ;
Sudan, Meena ;
Rakesh, Abhimanyu ;
Abrol, Deepak .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 18 (01) :81-83
[34]   Evaluation of oral prophylaxis during and after intensity-modulated radiotherapy due to head and neck cancer-a retrospective study [J].
Bichsel, D. ;
Lanfranchi, M. ;
Attin, T. ;
Graetz, K. W. ;
Stadlinger, B. .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 20 (04) :721-726
[35]   Clinical application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer [J].
Olivier Ballivy ;
Ramón Galiana Santamaría ;
Alicia Lozano Borbalas ;
Ferrán Guedea Edo .
Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2008, 10 :407-414
[36]   Clinical application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer [J].
Ballivy, Olivier ;
Santamaria, Ramon Galiana ;
Borbalas, Alicia Lozano ;
Edo, Ferran Guedea .
CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 10 (07) :407-414
[37]   Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: Ethics and methodology [J].
Lapeyre, M. ;
Biau, J. ;
Miroir, J. ;
Servagi-Vernat, S. ;
Giraud, P. .
CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2014, 18 (5-6) :365-368
[38]   Scintigraphic assessment of salivary function after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: Correlations with parotid dose and quality of life [J].
Chen, Wen-Cheng ;
Lai, Chia-Hsuan ;
Lee, Tsair-Fwu ;
Hung, Chao-Hsiung ;
Liu, Kuo-Chi ;
Tsai, Ming-Fong ;
Wang, Wen-Hung ;
Chen, Hungcheng ;
Fang, Fu-Ming ;
Chen, Miao-Fen .
ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 49 (01) :42-48
[39]   Dosimetric and geometric evaluation of the use of deformable image registration in adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer [J].
Eiland, R. B. ;
Maare, C. ;
Sjostrom, D. ;
Samsoe, E. ;
Behrens, C. F. .
JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2014, 55 (05) :1002-1008
[40]   A prospective study of salivary function sparing in patients with head-and-neck cancers receiving intensity-modulated or three-dimensional radiation therapy: Initial results [J].
Chao, KSC ;
Deasy, JO ;
Markman, J ;
Haynie, J ;
Perez, CA ;
Purdy, JA ;
Low, DA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 49 (04) :907-916