Evaluation and clinical implementation of in vivo dosimetry for kV radiotherapy using radiochromic film and micro-silica bead thermoluminescent detectors

被引:11
作者
Palmer, Antony L. [1 ,2 ]
Jafari, Shakardokht M. [1 ,2 ]
Mone, Ioanna [2 ]
Muscat, Sarah [1 ]
机构
[1] Portsmouth Hosp NHS Trust, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[2] Univ Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, England
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2017年 / 42卷
关键词
kV; In vivo; Film; Silica bead; ENERGY RESPONSE; GLASS-BEADS; PHOTON; RANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.08.009
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: kV radiotherapy treatment calculations are based on flat, homogenous, full-scatter reference conditions. However, clinical treatments often include surface irregularities and inhomogeneities, causing uncertainty. Therefore, confirmation of actual delivered doses in vivo is valuable. The current study evaluates, and implements, radiochromic film and micro silica bead TLD for in vivo kV dosimetry. Methods: The kV energy and dose response of EBT3 film and silica bead TLD was established and uncertainty budgets determined. In vivo dosimetry measurements were made for a consecutive series of 30 patients using the two dosimetry systems. Results: Energy dependent calibration factors were required for both dosimetry systems. The standard uncertainty estimate for in vivo measurement with film was 1.7% and for beads was 1.5%. The mean measured dose was -2.1% for film and -2.6% for beads compared to prescription. Deviations up to -9% were found in cases of large surface irregularity, or with underlying air cavities or bone. Dose shielding by beads could be clinically relevant at low kV energies and superficial depths. Conclusions: Both film and beads may be used to provide in vivo verification of delivered doses in kV radiotherapy, particularly for complex situations that are not well represented by standard reference condition calculations. (C) 2017 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 54
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Energy dependence and dose response of Gafchromic EBT2 film over a wide range of photon, electron, and proton beam energies [J].
Arjomandy, Bijan ;
Tailor, Ramesh ;
Anand, Aman ;
Sahoo, Narayan ;
Gillin, Michael ;
Prado, Karl ;
Vicic, Milos .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (05) :1942-1947
[2]  
Aukett R J, 2005, Phys Med Biol, V50, P2739, DOI 10.1088/0031-9155/50/12/001
[3]   Measurement of dose reductions for superficial x-rays backscattered from bone interfaces [J].
Butson, Martin J. ;
Cheung, Tsang ;
Yu, Peter K. N. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (17) :N329-N336
[4]   Energy response of the new EBT2 radiochromic film to x-ray radiation [J].
Butson, Martin J. ;
Yu, Peter K. N. ;
Cheung, Tsang ;
Alnawaf, Hani .
RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2010, 45 (07) :836-839
[5]   Radiochromic film for medical radiation dosimetry [J].
Butson, MJ ;
Yu, PKN ;
Cheung, T ;
Metcalfe, P .
MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING R-REPORTS, 2003, 41 (3-5) :61-120
[6]   Effect of the bone heterogeneity on the dose prescription in orthovoltage radiotherapy: A Monte Carlo study [J].
Chow, James C. L. ;
Grigorov, Grigor N. .
REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2012, 17 (01) :38-43
[7]   Surface dose reduction from bone interface in kilovoltage X-ray radiation therapy: a Monte Carlo study of photon spectra [J].
Chow, James C. L. ;
Owrangi, Amir M. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 13 (05) :215-222
[8]   Reference radiochromic film dosimetry: Review of technical aspects [J].
Devic, Slobodan ;
Tomic, Nada ;
Lewis, David .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 32 (04) :541-556
[9]   Radiochromic film dosimetry: Past, present, and future [J].
Devic, Slobodan .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 27 (03) :122-134
[10]   Review of backscatter measurement in kilovoltage radiotherapy using novel detectors and reduction from lack of underlying scattering material [J].
Eaton, David J. ;
Doolan, Paul J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 14 (06) :5-17