Sustainable Energy Management Benchmark at Wastewater Treatment Plant

被引:6
作者
Kiselev, Andrey [1 ]
Magaril, Elena [1 ]
Panepinto, Deborah [2 ]
Rada, Elena Cristina [3 ]
Ravina, Marco [2 ]
Zanetti, Maria Chiara [2 ]
机构
[1] Ural Fed Univ, Dept Environm Econ, Ekaterinburg 620002, Russia
[2] Politecn Torino, Dept Environm Land & Infrastruct Engn, Corso Duca Abruzzi 24, I-10129 Turin, Italy
[3] Univ Insubria, Dept Theoret & Appl Sci, Via GB Vico 46, I-21100 Varese, Italy
关键词
wastewater; sustainable management; circular economy; benchmark; energy; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; STRATEGIES;
D O I
10.3390/su132212885
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban wastewater effluents bring large amounts of nutrients, organic matter, and organic microcontaminants into freshwater ecosystems. Ensuring the quality of wastewater treatment (WWT) is one of the main challenges facing the management of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). However, achievement of high-quality standards leads towards significant energy consumption: usually the more intensive WWT process requires additional energies. Energy efficiency at WWTP is actual mainstream on the current sustainable development agenda. The WWTP processes and methods can be considered from the standpoint of material and energy flows according to circular economy paradigm, which offers great possibilities to reuse waste originating from WWT in order to receive renewable energy. The correlation between energy and quality issues to evaluate WWTP efficiency is of a great scientific and practical interest. The main goal of the paper is to check the dependency between these two main issues in WWTP management-WWT quality and energy efficiency-and to determine possible limits of such relation. The municipal sewerage system of Ekaterinburg, Russia was studied within this paper. The total length of centralized sewerage system in Ekaterinburg is over 1500 km of pipes within two main sewerage basins: northern and southern. The methodological framework for the current research consisted of three steps: (i) WWT quality evaluation, (ii) energy efficiency evaluation, and (iii) WWTP Quality/Energy (Q/E) efficiency dependency matrix. For the purpose of research, authors investigated the 2015-2018 period. The results showed that the outputs correlate with the technical conditions of WWTPs and the implementation of the best available techniques (BATs): most of the northern WWTP values are referred to the green zone (good rank), while the southern WWTP values are situated generally in the orange zone (unsatisfactory rank). The proposed methodological approach for Q/E dependency of WWT process creates a strong but simple tool for managers to evaluate the current success of the operation of WWTP and progress towards circular economy practices implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Alex J., 2008, BENCHMARK SIMULATION
[2]   Energy benchmarking in wastewater treatment plants: the importance of site operation and layout [J].
Belloir, C. ;
Stanford, C. ;
Soares, A. .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 36 (02) :260-269
[3]   Feasibility analysis for reduction of carbon footprint in a wastewater treatment plant [J].
Borzooei, Sina ;
Campo, Giuseppe ;
Cerutti, Alberto ;
Meucci, Lorenza ;
Panepinto, Deborah ;
Ravina, Marco ;
Riggio, Vincenzo ;
Ruf, Barbara ;
Scibilia, Gerardo ;
Zanetti, Mariachiara .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 271
[4]   Improving wastewater treatment plants operational efficiency and effectiveness through an integrated performance assessment system [J].
Cassidy, J. ;
Silva, T. ;
Semiao, N. ;
Ramalho, P. ;
Santos, A. ;
Feliciano, J. .
H2OPEN JOURNAL, 2020, 3 (01) :276-287
[5]   Optimal control towards sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on multi-agent reinforcement learning [J].
Chen, Kehua ;
Wang, Hongcheng ;
Valverde-Perez, Borja ;
Zhai, Siyuan ;
Vezzaro, Luca ;
Wang, Aijie .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2021, 279 (279)
[6]   Applying performance indices in plantwide modelling for a comparative study of wastewater treatment plant operational strategies [J].
De Ketele, Justine ;
Davister, Dries ;
Ikumi, David S. .
WATER SA, 2018, 44 (04) :539-550
[7]   Environmental and Energy Assessment of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants in Italy and Romania: A Comparative Study [J].
Fighir , Daniela ;
Teodosiu, Carmen ;
Fiore, Silvia .
WATER, 2019, 11 (08)
[8]   Unit Energy Consumption as Benchmark to Select Energy Positive Retrofitting Strategies for Finnish Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs): a Case Study of Mikkeli WWTP [J].
Gurung K. ;
Tang W.Z. ;
Sillanpää M. .
Environmental Processes, 2018, 5 (03) :667-681
[9]   Envisaging wastewater-to-energy practices for sustainable urban water pollution control: Current achievements and future prospects [J].
Huang, Bao-Cheng ;
He, Chuan-Shu ;
Fan, Nian-Si ;
Jin, Ren-Cun ;
Yu, Han-Qing .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2020, 134
[10]  
Kiselev Andrey, 2020, International Journal of Energy Production and Management, V5, P234, DOI 10.2495/EQ-V5-N3-234-244