Validity and reliability of the Turkish "Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation" questionnaire

被引:15
|
作者
Ozturk, Ozgul [1 ]
Sari, Zubeyir [2 ]
Ozgul, Bahar [2 ]
Tasyikan, Levent [3 ]
机构
[1] Turkish Red Crescent Altintepe Med Ctr, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Marmara Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Caycuma Publ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Zonguldak, Turkey
关键词
Disability; outcome questionnaire; PRWE; Turkish version; validity; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; EVALUATION PRWE; SWEDISH VERSION; DISABILITY; VALIDATION; GERMAN; HAND; PAIN;
D O I
10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0208
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scale is a self-administered outcome questionnaire used to determine level of pain and disability in wrist problems. The scale includes pain (PRWE-P) and function (PRWE-F) subscales, the latter consisting of specific function (PRWE-SF) and usual (PRWE-UF) function. This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the PRWE scale. Methods: Permission was sought and received from the original author of the PRWE for a Turkish translation for use in the study. The study included 110 patients (85 female and 25 male; mean age: 50.8 +/- 1.53 years; range: 18 to 85) with distal radius fracture, carpal tunnel syndrome, wrist ganglion cyst, De Quervain syndrome, Kienbock disease, and connective lesions affecting the wrist, all of whom completed the Turkish version of both the PRWE (PRWE-T) and the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand scale (DASH). Reliability and validity of the PRWE-T scale were evaluated via an internal consistency analysis and a factor analysis respectively. The level of correlation between PRWE-T and DASH scores was also examined. Results: Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated as 0.86, 0.82 and 0.88 for PRWE-P, PRWE-F and PRWE-T respectively for the scale and all subscales. The PRWE-T scale was found to be highly reliable. A statistically significant correlation was found between PRWE-T and DASH in the criterion-related validity analysis (Spearman's rho=0.9). Conclusion: The PRWE-T was found to be valid and reliable. It is therefore suggested for use in evaluating patient-based pain and disability levels in routine clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 125
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Brazilian version of the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE-BR): Cross-cultural adaptation, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity
    da Silva Rodrigues, Eula Katucha
    Registro Fonseca, Marisa de Cassia
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2015, 28 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [22] Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the patient-rated elbow evaluation
    Hanyu, Tadamasa
    Watanabe, Mikihiko
    Masatomi, Takashi
    Nishida, Keiichiro
    Nakagawa, Teruhiko
    Nishiura, Yasumasa
    Ohi, Hiroyuki
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2013, 18 (05) : 712 - 719
  • [23] Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation
    Zeynep Hazar Kanik
    Omer Osman Pala
    Gul Oznur Karabicak
    Seyit Citaker
    Clinical Rheumatology, 2019, 38 : 3289 - 3295
  • [24] Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: Good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius
    Wilcke, Maria T.
    Abbaszadegan, Hassan
    Adolphson, Per Y.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY AND HAND SURGERY, 2009, 43 (02): : 94 - 101
  • [25] Translation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire
    Yilmaz, Onur
    Gafuroglu, Umit
    Yuksel, Selcen
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 65 (01) : 59 - 66
  • [26] Cross-cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Testing of the Hindi Version of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation
    Mehta, Saurabh P.
    Mhatre, Bhavna
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    Mehta, Amita
    JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2012, 25 (01) : 65 - 78
  • [27] Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire
    Vincent, Joshua
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2014, 60 (04) : 240 - 240
  • [28] Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Munich Wrist Questionnaire in Patients With Wrist Problems
    Yetis, Mehmet
    Ceylan, Ismail
    Canli, Mehmet
    Gurses, Omer Alperen
    Aslan, Mensure
    Horoz, Levent
    Tayfur, Abdulhamit
    EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2024, 47 (01) : 105 - 110
  • [29] Adaptation and transcultural translation into Spanish of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire
    Gallego-Izquierdo, Tomas
    Ruiz-Vindel, Juan
    Ferragut-Garcias, Alejandro
    Martinez-Merinero, Patricia
    Montanez-Aguilera, Francisco J.
    Noriega-Matanza, Concha
    Achalandabaso-Ochoa, Alexander
    Pecos-Martin, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2020, 38 (12) : 2601 - 2607
  • [30] The patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation was successfully translated to the Slovenian language
    Kljajic, Josipa
    Celan, Dusan
    Papez, Breda Jesensek
    Bojnec, Vida
    JOURNAL OF HAND THERAPY, 2023, 36 (03) : 730 - 735