Case Study Analysis of STPA as Basis for Dynamic Safety Assurance of Autonomous Systems

被引:0
作者
Buysse, Laure [1 ]
Vanoost, Dries [1 ]
Vankeirsbilck, Jens [2 ]
Boydens, Jeroen [2 ]
Pissoort, Davy [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Engn Technol, Dept Elect Engn, Spoorwegstr 12, B-8200 Brugge, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Fac Engn Technol, Dept Comp Sci, Spoorwegstr 12, B-8200 Brugge, Belgium
来源
DEPENDABLE COMPUTING, EDCC 2022 WORKSHOPS | 2022年 / 1656卷
关键词
STPA; Autonomous systems; Safety analysis;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-16245-9_3
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Although in the last decade we have seen a rapid increase in technological and academic developments in the domain of autonomous systems, ensuring the safety of these systems remains extremely challenging. Previously, the concept of dynamic safety cases (DSCs), ConSerts and runtime monitoring frameworks have been presented as an engineering solution for through-life safety assurance. However, these techniques will (initially) be only as good as the claims or rules they hold. Therefore, in this paper we provide a critical view on the use of STPA as a safety and risk analysis technique underlying the design of autonomous systems to aid with the system design and runtime safety assurance. Based on two case studies, we conclude that STPA is a promising technique towards safer autonomous systems. Although hazard generation and modularisation are not easy, we argue that STPA provides a different view on safety which aligns much better with an autonomous system view.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 45
页数:9
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] An STPA Safety Analysis Case Study of a Collaborative Robot Application
    Adriaensen, A.
    Pintelon, L.
    Costantino, F.
    Di Gravio, G.
    Patriarca, R.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2021, 54 (01): : 534 - 539
  • [2] Dynamic Assurance Cases: A Pathway to Trusted Autonomy
    Asaadi, Erfan
    Denney, Ewen
    Menzies, Jonathan
    Pai, Ganesh J.
    Petroff, Dimo
    [J]. COMPUTER, 2020, 53 (12) : 35 - 46
  • [3] Mind the gaps: Assuring the safety of autonomous systems from an engineering, ethical, and legal perspective
    Burton, Simon
    Habli, Ibrahim
    Lawton, Tom
    McDermid, John
    Morgan, Phillip
    Porter, Zoe
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 279
  • [4] Buysse L., 2022, STAMP WORKSHOP
  • [5] Dynamic Safety Cases for Through-life Safety Assurance
    Denney, Ewen
    Pai, Ganesh
    Habli, Ibrahim
    [J]. 2015 IEEE/ACM 37TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, VOL 2, 2015, : 587 - 590
  • [6] International Organization for Standardization, 2010, Safety of MachineryGeneral Principles for DesignRisk Assessment and Risk Reduction
  • [7] Towards dynamic safety assurance for Industry 4.0
    Javed, Muhammad Atif
    Ul Muram, Faiz
    Hansson, Hans
    Punnekkat, Sasikumar
    Thane, Henrik
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE, 2021, 114
  • [8] SMOF: A Safety Monitoring Framework for Autonomous Systems
    Machin, Mathilde
    Guiochet, Jeremie
    Waeselynck, Helene
    Blanquart, Jean-Paul
    Roy, Matthieu
    Masson, Lola
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2018, 48 (05): : 702 - 715
  • [9] Nancy L., 2018, STPA HDB
  • [10] Nicholson M., 2019, SAFETY CRITICAL SYST