Dinoprostone versus cervical ripening balloon for term nulliparous labor induction following primary Dinoprostone induction failure

被引:0
|
作者
Lauterbach, Roy [1 ]
Ben David, Chen [2 ]
Siegler, Yoav [2 ]
Justman, Naphtali [2 ]
Bachar, Gal [3 ]
Vitner, Dana [4 ]
Ghanim, Nadier [2 ]
Beloosesky, Ron [5 ]
Weiner, Zeev [2 ]
Ginsberg, Yuval [5 ]
Khatib, Nizar [6 ]
机构
[1] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Rambam Healthcare Campus, Haifa, Israel
[3] Rambam Healthcare Campus, Ramat Yishai, Israel
[4] Rambam Healthcare Campus, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Rambam Med Ctr, Haifa, Israel
[6] Rambam Healthcare Campus, Akko, Israel
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
985
引用
收藏
页码:S628 / S629
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cervical ripening and labor induction with a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert
    Hughes, E
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (04): : 637 - 638
  • [22] Intracervical double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone for cervical ripening in labor induction in pregnancies with a high risk of uterine hyperstimulation
    Canadas, Javier Vega
    Gonzalez, Maria Teulon
    Limon, Natalia Pagola
    Alguacil, Maria Sanz
    Prieto, Maria Garcia-Lujan
    Riaza, Rocio Canete
    Montero-Macias, Rosa
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2021, 304 (06) : 1475 - 1484
  • [23] Comparing two dinoprostone agents for cervical ripening and induction of labor: A randomized trial
    Marconi, Anna Maria
    Bozzetti, Patrizia
    Morabito, Alberto
    Pardia, Giorgio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2008, 138 (02): : 135 - 140
  • [24] Dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening and labor induction: A meta-analysis
    Sanchez-Ramos, L
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (03): : 519 - 520
  • [25] A randomized clinical trial comparing misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction
    Gupta, N.
    Mishra, S. L.
    Shradha, Jain
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2006, 56 (02): : 149 - 151
  • [26] Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor
    Nunes, F
    Rodrigues, R
    Meirinho, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 181 (03) : 626 - 629
  • [27] Impact of dinoprostone versus cook cervical ripening balloon on induction in pregnancies complicated by small-for-gestational-age fetuses at term
    Yan, Mingxing
    Li, Liying
    Wang, Jinji
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2024, 37 (01):
  • [28] Efficiency of dinoprostone insert for cervical ripening and induction of labor in women of full-term pregnancy compared with dinoprostone gel: A meta-analysis
    Zeng, Xianling
    Zhang, Yafei
    Tian, Quan
    Xue, Yan
    Sun, Rong
    Zheng, Wei
    An, Ruifang
    DRUG DISCOVERIES AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 9 (03): : 165 - 172
  • [29] Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial
    Shaheen, Nighat
    Khalil, Safia
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 39 (03): : 307 - 310
  • [30] Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel (Prepidil) for cervical ripening/labor induction
    Dimarco, C
    Ramin, K
    Ogburn, P
    Heise, R
    Harris, D
    Ramsey, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (06) : S217 - S217