Kidney autotransplantation after nephrectomy and work bench surgery as an ultimate approach to nephron-sparing surgery

被引:18
作者
Janssen, Martin W. W. [1 ]
Linxweiler, Johannes [1 ]
Philipps, Ines [1 ]
Buetow, Zentia [1 ,2 ]
Siemer, Stefan [1 ]
Stoeckle, Michael [1 ]
Ohlmann, Carsten-Henning [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saarland, Dept Urol & Pediat Urol, Kirrbergerstr 6, D-66421 Homburg, Germany
[2] Grp Hosp Diaconesse Croix St Simon, Serv Urol, Paris, France
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY | 2018年 / 16卷
关键词
RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; OUTCOMES; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12957-018-1338-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Kidney autotransplantation (KAT) is the ultimate approach for nephron-sparing surgery. It is a rarely used method in renal tumor surgery today as minimal invasive and open techniques for nephron-sparing surgery improve constantly. In this publication, the complication rate and the long-term functional and oncological outcome at a single center are analyzed. Methods: A prospectively constructed database of patients with renal tumors who underwent renal surgery was retrospectively analyzed to identify patients with KAT and describe surgical and oncological outcomes and to obtain long-term follow-up. Data collection included detailed surgical technique, complications (Clavian-Dindo), and hospital stay, as well as functional and oncological outcome and long-term follow-up. Results: Between 1976 and 2013, 12 patients (median age 50.5 years) underwent KAT for highly complex renal masses: in five cases for complex renal cell carcinoma (RCC), five cases for complex upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC), one case for a renal metastasis, and one case for nephroblastoma. The nephrectomy or nephron-ureterectomy was performed open via a flank or transabdominal. The median surgical time was 360 min (range 270-490 min). Intraoperatively, six cases required blood transfusions (50%). Six patients (50%) developed significant postoperative complications (Clavian-Dindo > 2). In two patients, intermittent hemodialysis for delayed graft function (16.6%) was needed, and in six cases (50%), additional blood transfusions postoperatively were necessary. At discharge from hospital, all patients had functioning grafts. The median hospital stay was 29.5 days (range 18-35). At follow-up (median follow-up of 83.5 +/- 40.7 months), six patients had died (50%)-all with functioning grafts (free from hemodialysis). In five cases, recurrence of primary tumor or metastatic disease was recorded. In four cases, the recurrent carcinoma could be resected; in detail, UTUC in three cases and one partial nephrectomy of the autotransplanted kidney was performed. One patient suffered from bone and lung metastasis. Two patients died finally tumor-related. Five patients (41.6%) are presently alive, without evidence of tumor relapse. One patient developed terminal renal failure requiring hemodialysis 105 months after autotransplantation. One additional patient was lost to follow-up; after 69 months, this patient had a functioning kidney and no evidence of disease-recurrence at the last follow-up. A cumulative number of 1424 months without hemodialysis was gained for these 12 patients. In the literature to date, most KAT are performed in benign disease, with minor but frequent complication. Here, we report the largest series of KAT for malignant kidney tumors. The complication rates are similar, compared to the recently reported series for benign indications with an improved graft survival rate. Since KAT requires a complex and challenging surgical approach, it should be performed by experienced kidney transplant surgeons. Conclusion: In very complex cases involving renal tumors and multi-morbidity, patients should be counseled well before KAT is considered. At the same time, KAT should not be abandoned in these very rare cases, especially when a nephron-sparing approach is otherwise not feasible. KAT can maintain renal function and quality of life and extend expectancy of life.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical efficacy of radical nephrectomy versus nephron-sparing surgery on localized renal cell carcinoma
    Wentao Li
    Yanlei Cheng
    Yi Cheng
    Hui Ren
    Na Han
    [J]. European Journal of Medical Research, 19
  • [42] Is nephron-sparing surgery relevant for unilateral Wilms tumors?
    Tricard, T.
    Lacreuse, I.
    Louis, V.
    Schneider, A.
    Chaussy, Y.
    Soler, L.
    Moog, R.
    Lang, H.
    Jacqmin, D.
    Becmeur, F.
    [J]. ARCHIVES DE PEDIATRIE, 2017, 24 (07): : 650 - 658
  • [43] Who Really Benefits From Nephron-sparing Surgery?
    Woldu, Solomon L.
    Weinberg, Aaron C.
    Korets, Ruslan
    Ghandour, Rashed
    Danzig, Matthew R.
    RoyChoudhury, Arindam
    Kalloo, Sean D.
    Benson, Mitchell C.
    DeCastro, G. Joel
    McKiernan, James M.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2014, 84 (04) : 860 - 867
  • [44] Nephron-sparing surgery for multifocal and hereditary renal tumors
    Metwalli, Adam R.
    Linehan, William M.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2014, 24 (05) : 466 - 473
  • [45] How important are surgical margins in nephron-sparing surgery?
    Van Poppel, Hein
    Joniau, Steven
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2007, 6 (08) : 533 - 539
  • [46] Peritoneal metastases after laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery for localized Wilms tumor
    Chui, Chan-Hon
    Lee, Anselm Chi-Wai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2011, 46 (03) : E19 - E21
  • [47] Risk factors and clinical management of haemorrhage after open nephron-sparing surgery
    Huber, Johannes
    Pahernik, Sascha
    Hallscheidt, Peter
    Sommer, Christof Matthias
    Hatiboglu, Gencay
    Haferkamp, Axel
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (10) : 1488 - 1493
  • [48] Does Histologic Subtype Affect Oncologic Outcomes After Nephron-sparing Surgery?
    Crepel, Maxime
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Liberman, Daniel
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Sun, Maxine
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Widmer, Hugues
    Arjane, Philippe
    Graefen, Markus
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Patard, Jean-Jacques
    Perrotte, Paul
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2009, 74 (04) : 842 - 845
  • [49] Nephron-Sparing Surgery Strategy: The Current Standard for the Treatment of Localised Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Ljungberg, Borje
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2011, 10 (03) : E49 - E51
  • [50] Comparison of Long-Term Results After Nephron-Sparing Surgery and Radical Nephrectomy in Treating 4-to 7-cm Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Milonas, Daimantas
    Skulcius, Giedrius
    Baltrimavicius, Ruslanas
    Auskalnis, Stasys
    Kincius, Marius
    Matjosaitis, Aivaras
    Gudinaviciene, Inga
    Smailyte, Giedre
    Jievaltas, Mindaugas
    [J]. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2013, 49 (05): : 223 - 228