Motivation and preference in isolation: a test of their different influences on responses to self-isolation during the COVID-19 outbreak

被引:28
作者
Weinstein, Netta [1 ,2 ]
Nguyen, Thuy-Vy [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Sch Psychol & Clin Language Sci, Reading, Berks, England
[2] Cardiff Univ, Sch Psychol, Cardiff, Wales
[3] Univ Durham, Dept Psychol, Durham, England
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
motivation; solitude; self-isolation; COVID-19; loneliness; RISKY-CHOICE; SCALE; SOLITUDE; HEALTH; LONELINESS; ANXIETY; YOUNG;
D O I
10.1098/rsos.200458
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This multi-wave study examined the extent that both preference and motivation for time alone shapes ill-being during self-isolation. Individuals in the USA and the UK are self-isolating in response to the COVID-19 outbreak. Different motivations may drive their self-isolation: some might see value in it (understood as the identified form of autonomous motivation), while others might feel forced into it by authorities or close others (family, friends, neighbourhoods, doctors; the external form of controlled motivation). People who typically prefer company will find themselves spending more time alone, and may experience ill-being uniformly, or as a function of their identified or external motivations for self-isolation. Self-isolation, therefore, offers a unique opportunity to distinguish two constructs coming from disparate literatures. This project examined preference and motivation (identified and external) for solitude, and tested their independent and interacting contributions to ill-being (loneliness, depression and anxiety during the time spent alone) across two weeks. Confirmatory hypotheses regarding preference and motivation were not supported by the data. A statistically significant effect of controlled motivation on change in ill-being was observed one week later, and preference predicted ill-being across two weeks. However, effect sizes for both were below our minimum threshold of interest.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Performance of the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale for caregiving research [J].
Andresen, Elena M. ;
Byers, Katherine ;
Friary, John ;
Kosloski, Karl ;
Montgomery, Rhonda .
SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2013, 1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, SOLITUDE RETURN SELF
[3]   The Psychological Effects of Solitary Confinement on Prisoners in Supermax Units Reviewing What We Know and Recommending What Should Change [J].
Arrigo, Bruce A. ;
Bullock, Jennifer Leslie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2008, 52 (06) :622-640
[4]   Adolescent developmental antecedents of risky driving among young adults [J].
Bingham, CR ;
Shope, JT .
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL, 2004, 65 (01) :84-94
[5]  
Brooks Samantha K, 2020, Lancet, V395, P912, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8., 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8]
[6]   INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN PREFERENCE FOR SOLITUDE [J].
BURGER, JM .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1995, 29 (01) :85-108
[7]   Loneliness and health: Potential mechanisms [J].
Cacioppo, JT ;
Hawkley, LC ;
Crawford, LE ;
Ernst, JM ;
Burleson, MH ;
Kowalewski, RB ;
Malarkey, WB ;
Van Cauter, E ;
Berntson, GG .
PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2002, 64 (03) :407-417
[8]  
Chambers D, 2013, PALGR MAC STUD FAM, P1, DOI 10.1057/9781137314444
[9]   HOW DO YOUNG BECOME ADULTS [J].
COLEMAN, JS .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1972, 42 (04) :431-439
[10]   The preference for solitude scale: Psychometric properties and factor structure [J].
Cramer, KM ;
Lake, RP .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1998, 24 (02) :193-199