Business for Good? An Investigation into the Strategies Firms Use to Maximize the Impact of Financial Corporate Philanthropy on Employee Attitudes

被引：28

作者：

Block, Emily S. ^{[1
]}

Glavas, Ante ^{[2
]}

Mannor, Michael J. ^{[3
]}

Erskine, Laura ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Notre Dame Univ, Dept Management, Mendoza Coll Business, 360A MCOB, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA

[2] Kedge Business Sch, Rue Antoine Bourdelle,BP 921, F-13288 Marseille 9, France

[3] Notre Dame Univ, Dept Management, Mendoza Coll Business, 365 MCOB, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA

[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, 650 Charles Young Dr S, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS | 2017年 / 146卷 / 01期

关键词：

Financial corporate philanthropy; Corporate social responsibility; Strategic partnerships; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP; ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION; CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIORS; PROSOCIAL IMPACT; JOB-PERFORMANCE; WORK ATTITUDES; MICROFOUNDATIONS; MANAGEMENT; ALTRUISM;

D O I：

10.1007/s10551-015-2930-8

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

Most research on the corporate philanthropy of organizations has focused on the external benefits of such initiatives for firms, such as benefits for firm reputation and opportunities. However, many firms justify their giving, in part, due to the positive impact it has on their employees. Little is known about the effectiveness of such efforts, or how they can be managed strategically to maximize impact. We hypothesize a main effect of office-level corporate philanthropy on average employee attitudes in that office, but also investigate three strategies that offices may use to enhance this impact. Testing our hypotheses with 3 years of data on attitudes of an average of 14,577 employees in 53 offices we find support for the main effect, but mixed support for the specific strategies used to enhance impact.

引用

页码：167 / 183

页数：17

共 118 条

[1] Building Micro-foundations for the Routines, Capabilities, and Performance Links [J].

Abell, Peter ;

Felin, Teppo ;

Foss, Nicolai .

MANAGERIAL AND DECISION ECONOMICS, 2008, 29 (06) :489-502

[2] Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations [J].

Aguilera, Ruth V. ;

Rupp, Deborah E. ;

Williams, Cynthia A. ;

Ganapathi, Jyoti .

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :836-863

[3] Embedded Versus Peripheral Corporate Social Responsibility: Psychological Foundations [J].

Aguinis, Herman ;

Glavas, Ante .

INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2013, 6 (04) :314-332

[4] What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda [J].

Aguinis, Herman ;

Glavas, Ante .

JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) :932-968

[5]

[Anonymous], 2003, Positive Organizational Scholarship

[6] STOCK OWNERSHIP AND COMPANY CONTRIBUTIONS TO CHARITY [J].

ATKINSON, L ;

GALASKIEWICZ, J .

ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1988, 33 (01) :82-100

[7] Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance [J].

Barnett, Michael L. ;

Salomon, Robert M. .

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2006, 27 (11) :1101-1122

[8]

Batson C. D., 2003, Handbook of psychology: Personality and social psychology, V5, P463

[9] Trust, accreditation, and philanthropy in the Netherlands [J].

Bekkers, R .

NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2003, 32 (04) :596-615

[10] Traditional and health-related philanthropy: The role of resources and personality [J].

Bekkers, Rene .

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2006, 69 (04) :349-366

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 →