A comparison of habitat use, morphology, clinging performance and escape behaviour among two divergent green anole lizard (Anolis carolinensis) populations

被引:107
|
作者
Irschick, DJ [1 ]
Carlisle, E
Elstrott, J
Ramos, M
Buckley, C
Vanhooydonck, B
Meyers, J
Herrel, A
机构
[1] Tulane Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[2] Univ Instelling Antwerp, Lab Funct Morphol, B-2610 Antwerp, Belgium
[3] No Arizona Univ, Dept Biol, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
关键词
capacity; differentiation; ecology; evolution; population;
D O I
10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00487.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We measured available and actual habitat use, morphology, escape behaviour and clinging ability in a large sample (N = 242) of green anoles, Anolis carolinensis, in a habitat consisting primarily of segregated dense clumps of broad leaves, Aspidistra elatior (Tulane University campus, LA) to compare against similar data collected previously from a more typical habitat c. 30 km away, consisting of continuous strands of bushes and trees (Good Hope Field, St. Charles Parish, LA). At Tulane the anoles perched primarily on the broad, smooth leaves of broad leaves, whereas in Good Hope Field (GHF) they predominantly perched on branches and tree trunks. The two populations differed significantly in morphology. In Tulane, the anoles tended to have shorter distal hindlimb elements, longer forelimb elements, and were more 'slender' than those at GHF. A comparison of escape behaviour showed population and sex differences. In both populations, females had significantly longer approach distances (i.e. were more 'wary') than males. These distances were, in addition, significantly longer at GHF than at Tulane for both sexes; this may be due to the potentially higher diversity and abundance of predators at GHF, although habituation to humans may also play a role. Anoles at Tulane had significantly larger toepads and higher clinging abilities than those at GHF. The enhanced clinging abilities of anoles at Tulane may have arisen due to their propensity to use smooth leaves as their primary substrate. Overall, our data reveal substantial ecological, behavioural, morphological, and functional differences among populations, some of which may be adaptive. (c) 2005 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 85, 223-234.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 234
页数:12
相关论文
共 18 条