The effect of sevoflurane and desflurane on upper airway reactivity

被引:41
作者
Klock, PA [1 ]
Czeslick, EG [1 ]
Klafta, JM [1 ]
Ovassapian, A [1 ]
Moss, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000542-200106000-00008
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Although bronchial reactivity can be assessed by changes in airway resistance, there is no well-accepted measure of upper airway reactivity during anesthesia. The authors used the stimulus of endotracheal tube cuff inflation and deflation to assess changes in airway reactivity in patients anesthetized with sevoflurane and desflurane. Methods: Sixty-four patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II participated in this randomized, double-blind study. Patients were anesthetized with either sevoflurane or desflurane at 1.0 and 1.8 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC). The trachea was stimulated by inflating the endotracheal tube cuff. A blinded observer assessed the severity of patient response to the stimulus and changes in hemodynamic variables. The process was repeated at the second MBC treatment condition. Results: At 1.0 MAC, patients anesthetized with desflurane had a more intense response and a greater likelihood of significant coughing and associated hemodynamic changes (both at P < 0.05). At 1.8 MAC, sevoflurane and desflurane both suppressed clinically significant responses to tracheal stimulation. Interrater reliability was excellent for this measure of upper airway reactivity(P < 0.001). Conclusions The assessment of the cough response to tracheal stimulation by endotracheal tube cuff inflation is a reliable and clinically meaningful measure of upper airway reactivity. At 1.0 MAC, sevoflurane is superior to desflurane for suppressing moderate and severe responses to this stimulus.
引用
收藏
页码:963 / 967
页数:5
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Comparison of the effects of etomidate, propofol, and thiopental on respiratory resistance after tracheal intubation
    Eames, WO
    Rooke, GA
    Wu, RSC
    Bishop, MJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (06) : 1307 - 1311
  • [2] NEUROCIRCULATORY RESPONSES TO SEVOFLURANE IN HUMANS - A COMPARISON TO DESFLURANE
    EBERT, TJ
    MUZI, M
    LOPATKA, CW
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 83 (01) : 88 - 95
  • [3] Sevoflurane requirements for tracheal intubation with and without fentanyl
    Katoh, T
    Nakajima, Y
    Moriwaki, G
    Kobayashi, S
    Suzuki, A
    Iwamoto, T
    Bito, H
    Ikeda, K
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (04) : 561 - 565
  • [4] KELLY RE, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V77, P540
  • [5] EFFECT OF PROPHYLACTIC BRONCHODILATOR TREATMENT ON LUNG RESISTANCE AFTER TRACHEAL INTUBATION
    KIL, HK
    ROOKE, GA
    RYANDYKES, MA
    BISHOP, MJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1994, 81 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [6] KIMURA T, 1994, ANESTH ANALG, V79, P378
  • [7] MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA
    LANDIS, JR
    KOCH, GG
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) : 159 - 174
  • [8] The effect of isoflurane, halothane, sevoflurane, and thiopental nitrous oxide on respiratory system resistance after tracheal intubation
    Rooke, GA
    Choi, JH
    Bishop, MJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 86 (06) : 1294 - 1299
  • [9] VANHEMELRIJCK J, 1991, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V75, P197
  • [10] INDUCTION AND MAINTENANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF ANESTHESIA WITH DESFLURANE AND NITROUS-OXIDE IN INFANTS AND CHILDREN
    ZWASS, MS
    FISHER, DM
    WELBORN, LG
    COTE, CJ
    DAVIS, PJ
    DINNER, M
    HANNALLAH, RS
    LIU, LMP
    SARNER, J
    MCGILL, WA
    ALIFIMOFF, JK
    EMBREE, PB
    COOK, DR
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (03) : 373 - 378