Physicians' decisions to override computerized drug alerts in primary care

被引:354
作者
Weingart, SN
Toth, M
Sands, DZ
Aronson, MD
Davis, RB
Phillips, RS
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Div Gen Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.163.21.2625
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Although computerized physician order entry reduces medication errors among inpatients, little is known about the use of this system in primary care. Methods: We calculated the override rate among 3481 consecutive alerts generated at 5 adult primary care practices that use a common computerized physician order entry system for prescription writing. For detailed review, we selected a random sample of 67 alerts in which physicians did not prescribe an alerted medication and 122 alerts that resulted in a written prescription. We identified factors associated with the physicians' decisions to override a medication alert, and determined whether an adverse drug event (ADE) occurred. Results: Physicians overrode 91.2% of drug allergy and 89.4% of high-severity drug interaction alerts. In the multivariable analysis using the medical chart review sample (n=189), physicians were less likely to prescribe an alerted medication if the prescriber was a house officer (odds ratio [OR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08-0.84) and if the patient had many drug allergies (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.53-0.93). They were more likely to override alerts for renewals compared with new prescriptions (OR, 17.74; 95% CI, 5.60-56.18). We found no ADEs in cases where physicians observed the alert and 3 ADEs among patients with alert overrides, a nonsignificant difference (P=.55). Physician reviewers judged that 36.5% of the alerts were inappropriate. Conclusions: Few physicians changed their prescription in response to a drug allergy or interaction alert, and there were few ADEs, suggesting that the threshold for alerting was set too low. Computerized physician order entry systems should suppress alerts for renewals of medication combinations that patients currently tolerate.
引用
收藏
页码:2625 / 2631
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Abookire SA, 2000, J AM MED INFORM ASSN, P2
[2]   Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors [J].
Bates, DW ;
Leape, LL ;
Cullen, DJ ;
Laird, N ;
Petersen, LA ;
Teich, JM ;
Burdick, E ;
Hickey, M ;
Kleefield, S ;
Shea, B ;
Vander Vliet, M ;
Seger, DL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (15) :1311-1316
[3]   Adverse drug events in ambulatory care [J].
Gandhi, TK ;
Weingart, SN ;
Borus, J ;
Seger, AC ;
Peterson, J ;
Burdick, E ;
Seger, DL ;
Shu, K ;
Federico, F ;
Leape, LL ;
Bates, DW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (16) :1556-1564
[4]  
GANDHI TK, 2001, J GEN INTERN MED S, V16, P133
[5]  
Kuperman G J, 1996, Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp, P704
[6]   Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: Results of a randomized controlled trial [J].
Kuperman, GJ ;
Teich, JM ;
Tanasijevic, MJ ;
Ma'Luf, N ;
Rittenberg, E ;
Jha, A ;
Fiskio, J ;
Winkelman, J ;
Bates, DW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 1999, 6 (06) :512-522
[7]  
KUPERMAN GJ, 1994, J AM MED INFORM ASSN, P836
[8]  
*LEAPFR GROUP, FACT SHEET
[9]  
*MASS COAL PREV ME, MHA BEST PRACT REC R
[10]  
MCDONALD CJ, 1992, M D COMPUT, V9, P304