MULTIPLE-CONCLUSION LP AND DEFAULT CLASSICALITY

被引：48
作者：
Beall, J. C. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Philosophy, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Philosophy, Dunedin, New Zealand
来源：
REVIEW OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC | 2011年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词：
PARADOX; LOGIC;
D O I：
10.1017/S1755020311000074
中图分类号：
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号：
070104 ;
摘要：
Philosophical applications of familiar paracomplete and paraconsistent logics often rely on an idea of 'default classicality'. With respect to the paraconsistent logic LP (the dual of Strong Kleene or K3), such 'default classicality' is standardly cashed out via an LP-based nonmonotonic logic due to Priest (1991, 2006a). In this paper, I offer an alternative approach via a monotonic multiple-conclusion version of LP.
引用
收藏
页码：326 / 336
页数：11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Anderson A.R., 1992, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, V2
[2]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS LANGUAGE PHIL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, LOGIC METHODOLOGY PH
[4]  
Asenjo F. G., 1966, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V16, P103, DOI [10.1305/ndjfl/1093958482, DOI 10.1305/NDJFL/1093958482]
[5]  
Baaz M., 1993, TUWE1852BFZ193
[6]  
BAAZ M, 1993, TUWE1852BFZ292
[7]  
BEALL J, 2011, SUPPLEMENT LOGIC BAS
[8]  
Beall J.C., 2010, Logic: The Basics
[9]  
Beall J.C., 2003, POSSIBILITIES PARADO
[10]  
Beall Jc, 2009, SPANDRELS TRUTH
123