Transforaminal lumbar interbody debridement and fusion for the treatment of infective spondylodiscitis in the lumbar spine

被引:38
作者
Lu, Meng-Ling [1 ]
Niu, Chi-Chien [1 ,2 ]
Tsai, Tsung-Ting [1 ,2 ]
Fu, Tsai-Sheng [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Lih-Huei [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Wen-Jer [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
Infective spondylodiscitis; Lumbar spine; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Transforaminal lumbar interbody debridement and fusion; PYOGENIC VERTEBRAL OSTEOMYELITIS; TITANIUM MESH CAGES; ANTERIOR DEBRIDEMENT; TREATED PATIENTS; POSTERIOR; INSTRUMENTATION; SPONDYLITIS; MANAGEMENT; TLIF;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-014-3585-3
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
To determine the safety and efficacy of using a single posterior approach with transforaminal lumbar interbody debridement and fusion (TLIDF) plus pedicle screws fixation in treating infective spondylodiscitis in the lumbar spine. Between January 2009 and June 2011, 28 patients with infective spondylodiscitis who underwent TLIDF, using autogenous graft and posterior pedicle screws instrumentation, met the indications for surgery, and completed more than 18 months of follow-up, were included. Clinical outcomes were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Kirkaldy-Willis functional outcome criteria. Infection status was evaluated using C-reactive protein levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and clinical symptoms. The interbody fusion status and sagittal alignment of the infected segments were assessed using radiographic studies. Intra-operative culture rate was 82.1 %. The most common pathogen was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. One post-operative deep wound infection with septic implant loosening and one instance of early aseptic implant loosening were noted. Implants in both patients were subsequently removed. Two infections recurred within 3 months post-operatively, with both subsiding within 3 months after extended antibiotic treatment. VAS and ODI values were significantly improved. The interbody fusion rate was 82.1 % and the lordotic angle of the infected segments and the lumbar spine were corrected by 9.7A degrees and 14.3A degrees, respectively at the last follow-up. A single posterior approach with TLIDF and pedicle screws instrumentation for lumbar infective spondylodiscitis provided a satisfactory clinical outcome, adequate infection control and good fusion rate, and this strategy avoids the risks of anterior or staging surgeries.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 560
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcomes of extended transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylosis
    Talia, Adrian J.
    Wong, Michael L.
    Lau, Hui C.
    Kaye, Andrew H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 22 (11) : 1762 - 1770
  • [32] Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Ploumis, Avraam
    Wu, Chunhui
    Fischer, Gustav
    Mehbod, Amir A.
    Wu, Wentien
    Faundez, Antonio
    Transfeldt, Ensor E.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2008, 21 (02): : 120 - 125
  • [33] Early Intervention in Post-operative Infectious Spondylodiscitis: Outcome of Aggressive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Krishnan, A.
    Dave, B. R.
    Degulmadi, D.
    Mayi, S.
    Rai, R.
    Bang, P.
    Dave, M.
    Chauhan, V
    Bali, S.
    Charde, P.
    Anil, A.
    Krishnan, P.
    MALAYSIAN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL, 2024, 18 (03) : 16 - 26
  • [34] One-stage posterior debridement, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and instrumentation in treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis: a retrospective case series
    Hong-qi Zhang
    Min-zhong Lin
    Jin-song Li
    Ming-xing Tang
    Chao-feng Guo
    Jian-huang Wu
    Jin-yang Liu
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2013, 133 : 333 - 341
  • [35] Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion, Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Hu, Xijian
    Yan, Lei
    Jin, Xinjie
    Liu, Haifeng
    Chai, Jing
    Zhao, Bin
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (01) : 295 - 305
  • [36] Transforaminal Interbody Fusion Using the Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Technique Compared With Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spine Diseases: Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes
    Zheng, Bo
    Zhang, Xiu-Li
    Li, Peng
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 24 (06) : E395 - E401
  • [37] Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique Note and Comparison of Early Outcomes with Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Zhang, Hao
    Zhou, Chuanli
    Wang, Chao
    Zhu, Kai
    Tu, Qihao
    Kong, Meng
    Zhao, Chong
    Ma, Xuexiao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2021, 14 : 549 - 558
  • [38] TLIF - Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Figueiredo, N
    Martins, JWG
    Arruda, AA
    Serra, AR
    Figueiredo, MAA
    Diniz, RC
    Cavicchioli, AA
    ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2004, 62 (3B) : 815 - 820
  • [39] Comparison between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the management of lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Katuch, V
    Grega, R.
    Knorovsky, K.
    Banoci, J.
    Katuchova, J.
    Sasala, M.
    Ivankova, H.
    Kapralova, P.
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2021, 122 (09): : 653 - 656
  • [40] Biomechanical Comparison of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion by Finite Element Analysis
    Xu, Hao
    Tang, Hao
    Guan, Xuemei
    Jiang, Fugui
    Xu, Neng
    Ju, Wen
    Zhu, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Xiaojian
    Zhang, Qiulin
    Li, Ming
    NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 72 : 21 - 26