Does wind energy mitigate market power in deregulated electricity markets?

被引:12
作者
Ben-Moshe, Ori [1 ]
Rubin, Ofir D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Fac Engn Sci, Unit Energy Engn, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Guilford Glazer Fac Business & Management, Dept Publ Policy & Adm, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
Deregulated electricity markets; Oligopoly pricing; Wind energy; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; GENERATION; INTEGRATION; IMPACT; PRICE; CAPACITY; LONG;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.069
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
A rich body of literature suggests that there is an inverse relationship between wind power penetration rate into the electricity market and electricity prices, but it is unclear whether these observations can be generalized. Therefore, in this paper we seek to analytically characterize market conditions that give rise to this inverse relationship. For this purpose, we expand a recently developed theoretical framework to facilitate flexibility in modeling the structure of the electric industry with respect to the degree of market concentration and diversification in the ownership of wind power capacity. The analytical results and their attendant numerical illustrations indicate that the introduction of wind energy into the market does not always depress electricity prices. Such a drop in electricity prices is likely to occur when the number affirms is large enough or the ownership of wind energy is sufficiently diversified, or most often a combination of the two. Importantly, our study defines the circumstances in which the question of which type of firm invests in wind power capacity is crucial for market prices. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 521
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Equilibrium pricing and optimal hedging in electricity forward markets [J].
Bessembinder, H ;
Lemmon, ML .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (03) :1347-1382
[2]  
Botterud A., 2010, The Electricity Journal, V23, P71, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.TEJ.2010.03.006, 10.1016/j.tej.2010.03.006]
[3]   How to deal with negative power price spikes?-Flexible voluntary curtailment agreements for large-scale integration of wind [J].
Brandstaett, Christine ;
Brunekreeft, Gert ;
Jahnke, Katy .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (06) :3732-3740
[4]  
Bushnell James., 2005, Electricity Journal, V18, P11
[5]   An analysis of a feed-in tariff in Taiwan's electricity market [J].
Chang, Ming-Chung ;
Hu, Jin-Li ;
Han, Tsung-Fu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2013, 44 (01) :916-920
[6]   Market behaviour with large amounts of intermittent generation [J].
Green, Richard ;
Vasilakos, Nicholas .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (07) :3211-3220
[7]   Large-scale wind power in European electricity markets: Time for revisiting support schemes and market designs? [J].
Hiroux, C. ;
Saguan, M. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (07) :3135-3145
[8]   The electricity prices in the European Union. The role of renewable energies and regulatory electric market reforms [J].
Moreno, Blanca ;
Lopez, Ana J. ;
Teresa Garcia-Alvarez, Maria .
ENERGY, 2012, 48 (01) :307-313
[9]   Market design for a large share of wind power [J].
Newbery, David .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (07) :3131-3134
[10]   Wind power integration and power system flexibility-An empirical analysis of extreme events in Germany under the new negative price regime [J].
Nicolosi, Marco .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (11) :7257-7268