PMU Optimal Placement using Sensitivity Analysis for Power Systems Fault Location

被引:0
作者
Mohammadi, P. [1 ]
Mehraeen, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Elect Engn Bldg,South Campus Dr, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
来源
2015 IEEE ELECTRICAL POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE (EPEC) | 2015年
关键词
Phasor Measurement Unit (PMU); Optimal PMU Placement (OPP); Fault observability; Fault location; Voltage sensitivity index; Current sensitivity index; Multi-estimation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This article presents a novel algorithm to find optimal sets of Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) in power systems using measurement sensitivity analysis aiming for fault detection without multi-estimation. The algorithm generalizes the impedance method in fault detection through optimizing PMU utilization in order to detect a fault with desired precision in interconnected power systems. By deriving bus voltage and currents sensitivity indices to the fault location and impedance, possible deviations of the estimated fault location and/or impedance due to measurement noise, accuracy, precision limits, or simply the inability of a measurement point to sense a fault is evaluated. Therefore, the algorithm can solve Optimal PMU Placement (OPP) for desired fault detection precision based on these indices for various points of measurement observing faults in the system. Finally, avoiding multi-estimation guarantees the unique mapping between measurements of the selected PMU sets and faults throughout the system. The proposed algorithm is performed on the IEEE 7-bus and 14-bus benchmark systems and the fault location capability is evaluated through neural networks.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 249
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimal Fault Location in Distribution Systems Using Distributed Disturbance Recordings
    Janssen, Pierre
    Sezi, Tevfik
    Maun, Jean-Claude
    2011 2ND IEEE PES INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION ON INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES (ISGT EUROPE), 2011,
  • [42] Optimal PMU placement method for complete topological and numerical observability of power system
    Sodhi, Ranjana
    Srivastava, S. C.
    Singh, S. N.
    ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2010, 80 (09) : 1154 - 1159
  • [43] Optimal PMU placement for power system observability considering secondary voltage control
    Mohammadi-Ivatloo, B.
    Hosseini, S. H.
    2008 CANADIAN CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-4, 2008, : 352 - +
  • [44] Fault Location using PMU Measurements and Wide-area Infrastructure
    Picard, Stephan D.
    Adamiak, Mark G.
    Madani, Vahid
    2015 68TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE FOR PROTECTIVE RELAY ENGINEERS, 2015, : 272 - 277
  • [45] Optimal PMU Placement using Best First Search Algorithm with Pruning
    Venkatesh, T.
    Jain, Trapti
    2014 EIGHTEENTH NATIONAL POWER SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (NPSC), 2014,
  • [46] Complete and Incomplete Observability Analysis by Optimal PMU Placement Techniques of a Network
    Krishna, K. Bala
    Rosalina, K. Mercy
    Ramaraj, N.
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 13 (05) : 1814 - 1820
  • [47] Fault Location in Distribution Network by Solving the Optimization Problem Based on Power System Status Estimation Using the PMU
    Dashtdar, Masoud
    Hussain, Arif
    Al Garni, Hassan Z.
    Mas'ud, Abdullahi Abubakar
    Haider, Waseem
    AboRas, Kareem M.
    Kotb, Hossam
    MACHINES, 2023, 11 (01)
  • [48] Optimal PMU placement for power system observability using binary particle swarm optimization and considering measurement redundancy
    Ahmadi, A.
    Alinejad-Beromi, Y.
    Moradi, M.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (06) : 7263 - 7269
  • [49] Optimal Placement of Voltage Sag Monitors Based on Fault Location Principle
    Chen, L. P.
    Xu, W. T.
    Cao, K. J.
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY (POWERCON), 2014,
  • [50] Optimal Placement of Fault Indicators to Identify Fault Zones in Distribution Systems
    Santos, Gustavo G.
    Vieira, Jose Carlos M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY, 2021, 36 (05) : 3282 - 3285