Cochlear implant - speech and language development in deaf and hard of hearing children following implantation

被引:12
作者
Ostojic, Sanja [1 ]
Djokovic, Sanja [1 ]
Dimic, Nadezda [1 ]
Mikic, Branka [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Fac Special Educ & Rehabil, Surdol Dept, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
[2] Clin Ctr Serbia, Inst ENT & HNS, Belgrade, Serbia
关键词
cochlear implants; deafness; hearing loss; language tests; cochlear implantation; child; child preschool; EARS PROTOCOL; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.2298/VSP1104349O
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Bacground/Aim. Almost 200 cochlear implantations were done in the four centers (two in Belgrade, per one in Novi Sad and Nis) in Serbia from 2002 to 2009. Less than 10% of implantees were postlingually deaf adults. The vast majority, i.e. 90% were pre- and perilingually profoundly deaf children. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of improved auditory perception due to cochlear implantation on comprehension of abstract words in children as compared with hearing impaired children with conventional hearing aids and normal hearing children. Methods. Thirty children were enrolled in this study: 20 hearing impaired and 10 normal hearing. The vocabulary test was used. Results. The overall results for the whole test (100 words) showed a significant difference in favor of the normal hearing as compared with hearing impaired children. The normal hearing children successfully described or defined 77.93% of a total of 100 words. Success rate for the cochlear implanted children was 26.87% and for the hearing impaired children with conventional hearing aids 20.32%. Conclusion. Testing for abstract words showed a statistically significant difference between the cochlear implanted and the hearing impaired children with hearing aids (Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.019) implying considerable advantage of cochlear implants over hearing aids regarding successful speech development in prelingually deaf children.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 352
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Auditory perception and speech identification in children with cochlear implants tested with the EARS protocol [J].
Allum, JHJ ;
Greisiger, R ;
Straubhaar, S ;
Carpenter, MG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2000, 34 (05) :293-303
[2]  
BRAJOVIC L, 1986, SPECIAL AUDIOLOGY
[3]  
COOPER H, 2006, COCHLEAR IMPLANTS PR, P48
[4]  
DIMIC N, 2007, SPECIAL EUCATION REH, P87
[5]  
DOKOVIC S, 2004, INDIVIDUAL TREATMENT
[6]  
Gstoettner WK, 2000, ACTA OTO-LARYNGOL, V120, P209
[7]   Follow up of cochlear implanted handicapped children [J].
Hamzavi, J ;
Baumgartner, WD ;
Egelierler, B ;
Franz, P ;
Schenk, B ;
Gstoettner, W .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2000, 56 (03) :169-174
[8]  
MIKIC B, 2008, ASSESSMENT AUDITORY, P199
[9]  
MIRIC D, 2009, THESIS FACULTY SPECI
[10]   SPEECH-INTELLIGIBILITY OF CHILDREN WITH COCHLEAR IMPLANTS, TACTILE AIDS, OR HEARING-AIDS [J].
OSBERGER, MJ ;
MASO, M ;
SAM, LK .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1993, 36 (01) :186-203