Side-docking in robotic-assisted gynaecologic cancer surgery

被引:6
|
作者
Woods, Demetrius Leon [1 ]
Hou, June Y. [1 ]
Riemers, Laura [1 ]
Gupta, Divya [1 ]
Kuo, Dennis Yi-Shin [1 ]
机构
[1] Montefiore Med Ctr, Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Div Gynecol Oncol,Belfer Educ Ctr, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
关键词
robotic surgery; hysterectomy; minimally invasive surgery; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; SURGICAL OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.368
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The majority of previous experience with the robotic-sssisted laparoscopic technique for gynaecological procedures has utilized a method in which the robot is centrally located (CD) between the patient's legs. Methods Twelve consecutive patients undergoing robotic-assisted procedures for gynaecological malignancies were positioned in a side-docking (SD) fashion, in which the robot is positioned lateral to the patient. The relevant clinical parameters were collected and compared to the previous 12 patients undergoing surgery using the conventional, centre-docking (CD) technique. Results Specimen retrieval time for larger uteri was reduced in the SD group compared to the CD group (p = 0.03). Total operative times were slightly lower in the SD group and specimen retrieval times for all uterine weights were unchanged when compared to the CD group. Statistical significance was not observed. Conclusions Side-docking is an alternative to the conventional centre-docking approach in robotic-assisted surgery. Its use may facilitate larger specimen retrieval while decreasing operative time and associated costs. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 54
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Comparison of Open Surgery, Robotic-Assisted Surgery and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in the Treatment of Morbidly Obese Endometrial Cancer Patients
    Mendivil, Alberto A.
    Rettenmaier, Mark A.
    Abaid, Lisa N.
    Brown, John V., III
    Micha, John P.
    Lopez, Katrina L.
    Goldstein, Bram H.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2015, 19 (01)
  • [32] A Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes in Uterine Cancer Surgery After the Introduction of Robotic-Assisted Surgery
    Agarwal, Reshu
    Rajanbabu, Anupama
    Goel, Gaurav
    Unnikrishnan, U. G.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2019, 69 (03) : 284 - 291
  • [33] Robotic-assisted reoperative benign foregut surgery
    Rao, Madhuri
    Schaffer, Emma
    MINI-INVASIVE SURGERY, 2025, 9
  • [34] Robotic-assisted surgery in children: Advantages and limitations
    Al-Bassam A.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2010, 4 (1) : 19 - 22
  • [35] On the Kinematics of Robotic-assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery
    From, Pal Johan
    MODELING IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL, 2013, 34 (02) : 69 - 82
  • [36] MAUDE: Analysis of Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery
    Manoucheri, Elmira
    Fuchs-Weizman, Noga
    Cohen, Sarah L.
    Wang, Karen C.
    Einarsson, Jon
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : 592 - 595
  • [37] Our anesthesia experiences at robotic-assisted and robotic cardiac surgery
    Kocyigit, Muharrem
    Akpek, Elif A.
    Tetik, Ozlem
    Senay, Sahin
    Alhan, Cem
    TURK GOGUS KALP DAMAR CERRAHISI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 21 (04): : 972 - 977
  • [38] A Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes in Uterine Cancer Surgery After the Introduction of Robotic-Assisted Surgery
    Reshu Agarwal
    Anupama Rajanbabu
    Gaurav Goel
    U. G. Unnikrishnan
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2019, 69 : 284 - 291
  • [39] Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecology—status quo
    Alkatout I.
    Maass N.
    Egberts J.-H.
    Jünemann K.-P.
    Ackermann J.
    Kimmig R.
    Der Gynäkologe, 2016, 49 (6): : 470 - 476
  • [40] Robotic-assisted pelvic organ prolapse surgery
    Ayav, A
    Bresler, L
    Hubert, J
    Brunaud, L
    Boissel, P
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2005, 19 (09): : 1200 - 1203