A new method for quality function deployment using double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and axiomatic design approach

被引:15
作者
Wang, Ze-Ling [1 ]
Liu, Hu-Chen [2 ,3 ]
Xu, Jin-Ye [1 ]
Ping, Ye-Jia [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ, Sch Management, 99 Shangda Rd, Shanghai 200444, Peoples R China
[2] China Jiliang Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
axiomatic design theory; double hierarchy hesitant linguistic term set; maximizing consensus; product development; quality function deployment; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; INFORMATION; QFD; BENCHMARKING; CONSENSUS; DISTANCE;
D O I
10.1080/08982112.2021.1912763
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As a useful product development technique, quality function deployment (QFD) can convert customer requirements into suitable engineering characteristics for maximum customer satisfaction. Nonetheless, the traditional QFD has been extensively criticized as having many defects in practical applications, which include the crisp evaluation of relationships between customer requirements and engineering characteristics, and the non-robust ranking of engineering characteristics. In this paper, we put forward a new method using double hierarchy hesitant linguistic term sets (DHHLTSs) and axiomatic design approach to enhance the performance of the classical QFD. Firs, the DHHLTSs are employed to evaluate the relationships between customer requirements and engineering characteristics. Then, the axiomatic design theory is extended to derive the prioritization of engineering characteristics in QFD. Additionally, a maximizing consensus method is used to determine the weights of experts considering inconsistency among their opinions. Finally, an empirical case of a shared car manufacturer is provided with a comparison analysis to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of our proposed QFD approach.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 522
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Akao Y., 1972, Stand. Qual. Control, V25, P7
[2]   Fuzzy QFD approach for managing SCOR performance indicators [J].
Akkawuttiwanich, Piyanee ;
Yenradee, Pisal .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 122 :189-201
[3]   Axiomatic Design for Lean-oriented Occupational Health and Safety systems: An application in shipbuilding industry [J].
Babur, Ferhat ;
Cevikcan, Emre ;
Durmusoglu, M. Bulent .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 100 :88-109
[4]   A fuzzy QFD approach using SERVQUAL and Kano models under budget constraint for hotel services [J].
Beheshtinia, Mohammad Ali ;
Azad, Mohsen Farzaneh .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2019, 30 (7-8) :808-830
[5]   Emergency decision making with extended axiomatic design approach under picture fuzzy environment [J].
Ding, Xue-Feng ;
Zhang, Ling ;
Liu, Hu-Chen .
EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2020, 37 (02)
[6]   Effective use of quality function deployment and Kansei engineering for product planning with sensory customer requirements: A plain yogurt case [J].
Dolgun, Leman Esra ;
Koksal, Guelser .
QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2018, 30 (04) :569-582
[7]   A New Model for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Based on k-Means Clustering Within Hesitant Linguistic Environment [J].
Duan, Chun-Yan ;
Chen, Xu-Qi ;
Shi, Hua ;
Liu, Hu-Chen .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 69 (05) :1837-1847
[8]   Fuzzy cognitive map based quality function deployment approach for dishwasher machine selection [J].
Efe, Burak .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 83
[9]   Uncovering differences and similarities among quality function deployment-based methods in Design for X: Benchmarking in different domains [J].
Fargnoli, Mario ;
Sakao, Tomohiko .
QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2017, 29 (04) :690-712
[10]   A new proposal to improve the customer competitive benchmarking in QFD [J].
Franceschini, Fiorenzo ;
Maisano, Domenico .
QUALITY ENGINEERING, 2018, 30 (04) :730-761