An assessment of written patient information provided at the genetic clinic and relating to genetic testing in seven European countries

被引:15
作者
Lewis, Celine
Mehta, Pritti
Kent, Alastair
Skirton, Heather
Coviello, Domenico
机构
[1] Genet Interest Grp, Eurogentest Project, Unit 4d Leroy House, London N1 3QP, England
[2] Univ Plymouth, Fac Hlth & Social Work, Taunton, Somerset, England
[3] Maggiore Policlin Mangiagalli & Regina Elena, Fdn IRCCS, Med Genet Lab, Milan, Italy
关键词
genetic testing; patient information; assessment; Europe;
D O I
10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201874
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the quality of written information for patients and families about genetic testing, from a range of European countries. Written information relating to genetic testing for five conditions was gathered from genetic departments across seven European countries. Written information for each condition from each country was randomly chosen for assessment. Fourteen key issues had been identified by a number of pre-existing tools (in particular the DISCERN-Genetics tool) as being important for inclusion when developing or assessing material relating to genetic testing. Fifty pieces in total were assessed for the inclusion or omission of key issues. Although the majority of information discussed issues relating to the condition including background and effect (n = 48, 96%), treatment and management (n = 37, 74%) and heredity and risk (n = 49, 98%), only half the information discussed where to obtain additional information and support (n = 25, 50%). Less than half the information discussed what happens after the test (n = 15, 30%), patient rights (n = 12, 24%) and shared decision making (n = 12, 24). Benefits were more likely to be included (n = 41, 82%) than any risks involved (n = 24, 48%). The issue discussed least frequently was the possible psychological and social effects of genetic testing (n = 9, 18%). Pre-written leaflets tended to provide a more comprehensive discussion of the issues surrounding genetic testing than personal letters did and should therefore routinely be available to patients alongside personal letters. Written information should include risks and limitations of testing as well as discussion of the psychological and social aspects of genetic testing.
引用
收藏
页码:1012 / 1022
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EUR UN CIT SOURC INF
[2]  
Arnold Angela, 2005, J Genet Couns, V14, P307, DOI 10.1007/s10508-005-0006-z
[3]   EVALUATION OF DRUG INFORMATION FOR CARDIOLOGY PATIENTS [J].
BAKER, D ;
ROBERTS, DE ;
NEWCOMBE, RG ;
FOX, KAA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 31 (05) :525-531
[4]   Shortcomings of health information on the Internet [J].
Benigeri, M ;
Pluye, P .
HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 18 (04) :381-386
[5]   Living with a hereditary disease:: Persons with muscular dystrophy and their next of kin [J].
Boström, K ;
Ahlström, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2005, 136A (01) :17-24
[6]   EuroGentest - a European Network of Excellence aimed at harmonizing genetic testing services [J].
Cassiman, JJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2005, 13 (10) :1103-1105
[7]   DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices [J].
Charnock, D ;
Shepperd, S ;
Needham, G ;
Gann, R .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1999, 53 (02) :105-111
[8]  
Cho MK, 1997, AM J MED GENET, V73, P314, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19971219)73:3<314::AID-AJMG16>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-M
[10]   Providing letters and audiotapes to supplement a prenatal diagnostic consultation: effects on later distress and recall [J].
Cope, CD ;
Lyons, AC ;
Donovan, V ;
Rylance, M ;
Kilby, MD .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2003, 23 (13) :1060-1067