共 50 条
Evidence map of ductal carcinoma in situ management options
被引:3
|作者:
Bouskill, Kathryn
[1
]
Hempel, Susanne
[2
,3
]
Richardson, Andrea
[4
]
Ganz, Patricia A.
[5
]
Baxi, Sangita
[6
]
Zutshi, Rushil
[6
]
Larkin, Jody
[7
]
Motala, Aneesa
[2
]
Miles, Jeremy N. V.
[8
]
Crandall, Carolyn J.
[2
,9
]
机构:
[1] RAND Corp, Behav & Policy Sci, Santa Monica, CA USA
[2] RAND Corp, Southern Calif Evidence Based Practice Ctr, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90401 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[4] RAND Corp, Behav & Policy Sci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Pardee RAND Grad Sch, Santa Monica, CA USA
[7] RAND Corp, Knowledge Serv, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[8] Google Inc, Los Angeles, CA USA
[9] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源:
MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY
|
2019年
/
26卷
/
11期
关键词:
Carcinoma;
Ductal carcinoma in situ;
Evidence map;
Intraductal;
Mastectomy;
Noninfiltrating;
Systematic review;
BREAST-CONSERVING SURGERY;
LYMPH-NODE BIOPSY;
RADIATION-THERAPY;
SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT;
LOCAL RECURRENCE;
NATURAL-HISTORY;
RADIOTHERAPY;
CANCER;
METAANALYSIS;
OUTCOMES;
D O I:
10.1097/GME.0000000000001397
中图分类号:
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号:
100211 ;
摘要:
Objective: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has the potential to progress to invasive carcinoma. The optimal management of DCIS and methods for individualizing treatment of DCIS are still being determined. This evidence map depicts the robustness and topical span of research on DCIS management choice on patient-centered and clinical outcomes. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, PubMed Health, PROSPERO, and clinical practice guideline sites to identify systematic reviews of DCIS management options and consulted with topic experts. A bubble plot visualizes the literature volume and research content for patient-centered outcomes. An online decision tree facilitates discussions with patients and guides through the available evidence. Results: In total, 40 systematic reviews met inclusion criteria. The research syntheses addressed DCIS management options, including the role of magnetic resonance imaging, axillary surgery/sentinel lymph node biopsy, and excisional biopsy. The map shows existing evidence for mutually exclusive treatment options including active surveillance, breast-conserving surgery, nipple sparing mastectomy, and simple mastectomy. Research findings for intraoperative radiation, adjuvant radiation therapy, adjuvant hormone therapy, hypofractionation radiotherapy, accelerated partial breast irradiation, radiation therapy plus boost, and combined radiation and hormone therapy, as well as for breast reconstruction after mastectomy and surveillance mammography postsurgery are also displayed. The evidence map highlights a scarcity of robust evidence on patient-centered outcomes. Conclusions: The evidence map provides an overview of DCIS research showing the range of management options and remaining decisional dilemmas that follow a diagnosis of DCIS. It maps the evidence in accessible tools to guide practice and future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1250 / 1258
页数:9
相关论文