Task intensity influences upper limb and torso kinematics during two common overhead Functional Capacity Evaluation tasks

被引:7
作者
Lang, Angelica E. [1 ]
Dickerson, Clark R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Hlth Sci, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Dept Kinesiol, Waterloo, ON, Canada
来源
WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION | 2017年 / 58卷 / 02期
关键词
Return to work; overhead work; overhead lift; upper extremity; body mechanics; LOW-BACK-PAIN; RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FUNCTION-CENTERED REHABILITATION; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; MUSCLE-ACTIVITY; SEX-DIFFERENCES; LIFTING CAPACITY; NORMATIVE VALUES; WORK; SHOULDER;
D O I
10.3233/WOR-172614
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) is a tool used in the return-to-work process to guide treatment and decision making. Individual abilities and maximum capacity can be determined through visual observations of changes in mechanics as intensity increases. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine kinematic differences between sexes and intensity levels of two common FCE tasks to establish normative behaviours. METHODS: Upper limb and torso kinematics were collected from 30 participants as they performed the overhead lift and overhead work FCE tasks. Mean, maximum, and minimum values were calculated for clinically relevant joint angles. Mean and maximum segment velocity was also calculated and each variable was tested with a mixed model ANOVA. RESULTS: During the overhead lift task, maximum torso flexion and maximum torso extension increased from the lightest to the heaviest load. Humeral flexion angle at the beginning of the lift and wrist ulnar deviation also increased with load. Torso extension, humeral flexion and axial rotation, and wrist extension all increased with time during the overhead work task. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing intensity during the overhead tasks influenced kinematic variables. These observable changes can be used by evaluators to more reliably determine safe maximum capacities for each patient and identify compensatory actions.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 134
页数:14
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   The effect of load on biomechanics during an overhead lift in the WorkHab Functional Capacity Evaluation [J].
Allen, Jaclyn L. ;
James, Carole ;
Snodgrass, Suzanne J. .
WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2012, 43 (04) :487-496
[2]  
[Anonymous], EUR J PHYS REHABIL M
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, OCCUPATIONAL BIOMECH
[4]  
[Anonymous], FUNCTIONAL CAPACITY
[5]   The effect of overhead drilling position on shoulder moment and electromyography [J].
Anton, D ;
Shibley, LD ;
Fethke, NB ;
Hess, J ;
Cook, TM ;
Rosecrance, J .
ERGONOMICS, 2001, 44 (05) :489-501
[6]   Biomechanics of changes in lumbar posture in static lifting [J].
Arjmand, N ;
Shirazi-Adl, A .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (23) :2637-2648
[7]   The reliability of WorkWell Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation: a systematic review [J].
Bieniek, Sebastian ;
Bethge, Matthias .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2014, 15
[8]   PSYCHOPHYSICAL BASES OF PERCEIVED EXERTION [J].
BORG, GAV .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1982, 14 (05) :377-381
[9]   Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain [J].
Brouwer, S ;
Reneman, MF ;
Dijkstra, PU ;
Groothoff, JW ;
Schellekens, JMH ;
Göeken, LNH .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 13 (04) :207-218
[10]   The relationship between lumbar spine load and muscle activity during extensor exercises [J].
Callaghan, JP ;
Gunning, JL ;
McGill, SM .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1998, 78 (01) :8-18