Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Inferior to Electroconvulsive Therapy in Treating Depression

被引:31
作者
Hansen, Poul Erik Buchholtz [1 ]
Ravnkilde, Barbara
Videbech, Poul
Clemmensen, Karin
Sturlason, Runa
Reiner, Mads
Parner, Erik [2 ]
Rosenberg, Raben
Vestergaard, Per
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept N, DK-8240 Risskov, Denmark
[2] Univ Aarhus, Inst Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
repetitive transcranial stimulation; low-frequency rTMS; depression; DOUBLE-BLIND; MAJOR DEPRESSION; PREFRONTAL-CORTEX; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; RTMS; EFFICACY; ECT;
D O I
10.1097/YCT.0b013e3181d77645
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objectives: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a potential new antidepressant method and alternative to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). The efficacy of right prefrontal low-frequency rTMS was shown in a previous placebo-controlled, randomized study but has never been compared with ECT. The aim of this study was to compare the antidepressant efficacy and adverse effects of right prefrontal low-frequency rTMS with that of ECT. Methods: Sixty inpatients with major depression were randomized to 15 days of 1-Hz right prefrontal rTMS or 9 unilateral ECTs. Depressive symptoms and adverse effects were recorded using the Hamilton Scale for Depression and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser side effect scale, supplied by neuropsychological assessment of cognitive functions. Results: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was significantly less effective than ECT. The intention-to-treat analysis revealed a 26% (confidence interval, 3%-51%) higher rate of partial remission (P = 0.035) by the end of week 3. There was no difference found between the 2 methods on the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser rating scale. However, psychological examination revealed ECT to have more adverse effects on cognitive functions, whereas the rTMS group improved particularly with respect to visual memory. Conclusions: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation was significantly less effective than ECT, but ECT had more adverse effects on cognitive function. The outcome does not point to right frontal low-frequency rTMS using the present stimulus design as a first-line substitute for ECT, but rather as a treatment option for patients with depression who are intolerant to other types of treatment or not accepting ECT.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 32
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Abrams R., 1997, Electroconvulsive therapy, V3rd
[2]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry: version 2
[5]   A controlled study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in medication-resistant major depression [J].
Avery, DH ;
Holtzheimer, PE ;
Fawaz, W ;
Russo, J ;
Neumaier, J ;
Dunner, DL ;
Haynor, DR ;
Claypoole, KH ;
Wajdik, C ;
Roy-Byrne, P .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 59 (02) :187-194
[6]  
BECH P, 1988, ACTA PSYCHIAT SCAND, V78, P45
[7]   ASSESSMENT OF SYMPTOM CHANGE FROM IMPROVEMENT CURVES ON THE HAMILTON DEPRESSION SCALE IN TRIALS WITH ANTIDEPRESSANTS [J].
BECH, P ;
ALLERUP, P ;
REISBY, N ;
GRAM, LF .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1984, 84 (02) :276-281
[8]   Putative common pathways in therapeutic brain stimulation for affective disorders [J].
Bolwig, TG .
CNS SPECTRUMS, 2003, 8 (07) :490-495
[9]  
Christensen A., 1975, Luria's neuropsychological investigation
[10]   Three and six-month outcome following courses of either ECT or rTMS in a population of severely depressed individuals - Preliminary report [J].
Dannon, PN ;
Dolberg, OT ;
Schreiber, S ;
Grunhaus, L .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 51 (08) :687-690