Willingness to Pay, Quality Perception, and Local Foods: The Case of Broccoli

被引:30
作者
Fan, Xiaoli [1 ]
Gomez, Miguel, I [2 ]
Coles, Phillip S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Resource Econ & Environm Sociol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Cornell Univ, Charles H Dyson Sch Appl Econ & Management, Ithaca, NY USA
[3] Lehigh Univ, Coll Business & Econ, Practice, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
broccoli; consumer preference; local foods; quality perception; willingness to pay; CONSUMER PREFERENCES; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; IMPACT; FRUIT; MILK;
D O I
10.1017/age.2019.21
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
A large and growing body of literature has studied consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for local foods in the United States. However, these studies implicitly assume that consumers perceive local foods to have superior quality than nonlocal foods. Little is known about WTP for local foods when taking into account differences in consumer perception of food quality between local and nonlocal foods. In this article, we conduct an economic experiment to assess the effect of locally grown information on consumer WTP and quality perceptions of three broccoli varieties (one commercial variety grown in California and two newly developed local varieties). Our results show that consumers rate both the appearance and the taste of the two local broccoli varieties lower than the California variety when evaluating food quality blindly. However, consumers' evaluations of the two local varieties improve substantially after being told the two varieties are locally grown. Results also indicate that consumers are willing to pay a price premium for the two local varieties after being told that they are locally grown. Our results provide evidence that locally grown information has a positive effect on both consumer WTP and quality perception of local foods.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 432
页数:19
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Consumers' willingness to pay for the color of salmon: A choice experiment with real economic incentives [J].
Alfnes, Frode ;
Guttormsen, Atle G. ;
Steine, Gro ;
Kolstad, Kari .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 88 (04) :1050-1061
[2]   Final report of the safety assessment of urea [J].
Andersen, FA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 24 :1-56
[3]   Patterns of fruit and vegetable buying behaviour in the United States and India [J].
Anesbury, Zachary ;
Greenacre, Luke ;
Wilson, Amy L. ;
Huang, Ava .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2018, 60 (01) :14-31
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, V34, P477, DOI [10.1017/S1074070800009251, DOI 10.1017/S1074070800009251]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SENSORY EVALUATION F, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-6488-5_10
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SENSORY EVALUATION P
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Vegetables 2016 Summary
[8]   Localization effects for a fresh vegetable product supply chain: Broccoli in the eastern United States [J].
Atallah, Shady S. ;
Gomez, Miguel I. ;
Bjoerkman, Thomas .
FOOD POLICY, 2014, 49 :151-159
[9]   MEASURING UTILITY BY A SINGLE-RESPONSE SEQUENTIAL METHOD [J].
BECKER, GM ;
DEGROOT, MH ;
MARSCHAK, J .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1964, 9 (03) :226-232
[10]   What Is It About Organic Milk? An Experimental Analysis [J].
Bernard, John C. ;
Bernard, Daria J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 91 (03) :826-836