Ecosystem disservices research: A review of the state of the art with a focus on cities

被引:282
作者
von Doehren, Peer [1 ]
Haase, Dagmar [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Inst Geog, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Ecosystem disservices; Human well-being; Literature review; Cities; Indicators; RURAL LANDSCAPES; HUMAN HEALTH; TRADE-OFFS; LAND-USE; SERVICES; BIODIVERSITY; FRAMEWORK; INDICATORS; BENEFITS; FOREST;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.027
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services, the benefits produced by ecosystem functions and structures for human well-being, have received continuous international attention since the publication of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) and the TEEB study (The Economics of Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity). Ecosystem functions also have effects that are harmful to human well-being, and these effects are called ecosystem disservices (EDS). The aim of this paper is to explore how ecosystem disservices have been recognised in the scientific literature and how the concept has been used in the discussion of socio-ecological systems. The paper analyses 103 studies on EDS. We use a quantitative approach to assess geographical spread, focus and indicator choice. This quantitative picture is supplemented by a qualitative discussion of the effects of ecosystem disservices on urban systems and cities. The results of the review show that although the idea of detrimental ecosystem effects is not new, systematic research on EDS has only just begun. Most studies on EDS focus on Western Europe or the USA. EDS have been more frequently discussed in the most human-dominated ecosystem types: i.e., in agricultural and urban ecosystems. The latter in particular will be central for future research on EDS, considering that more than 75% of the world's population is expected to live in urban environments by 2050. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 497
页数:8
相关论文
共 122 条
[101]   Biogas cropping systems: Short term response of yield performance and N use efficiency to biogas residue application [J].
Sieling, Klaus ;
Herrmann, Antje ;
Wienforth, Babette ;
Taube, Friedhelm ;
Ohl, Susanne ;
Hartung, Eberhard ;
Kage, Henning .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2013, 47 :44-54
[102]   Beyond monetary measurement: How to evaluate projects and policies using the ecosystem services framework [J].
Sijtsma, Frans J. ;
van der Heide, C. Martijn ;
van Hinsberg, Arjen .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2013, 32 :14-25
[103]   Management intensity - not biodiversity - the driver of ecosystem services in a long-term row crop experiment [J].
Snapp, Sieglinde S. ;
Gentry, Lowell E. ;
Harwood, Richard .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 138 (3-4) :242-248
[104]   Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services [J].
Spangenberg, Joachim H. ;
Settele, Josef .
ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (03) :327-337
[105]   Ecosystem services in agriculture: Determining suitability for provision by collective management [J].
Stallman, Heidi R. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 71 :131-139
[106]   Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits [J].
Swinton, Scott M. ;
Lupi, Frank ;
Robertson, G. Philip ;
Hamilton, Stephen K. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 64 (02) :245-252
[107]   Bringing together science and policy to protect and enhance wetland ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes [J].
Tanner, Chris C. ;
Howard-Williams, Clive ;
Tomer, Mark D. ;
Lowrance, Richard .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 56 :1-4
[108]  
TEEB, 2010, EC EC BIOD MAINSTR E
[109]   Environmental services and land use change in Southeast Asia: from recognition to regulation or reward? [J].
Tomich, TP ;
Thomas, DE ;
van Noordwijk, M .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 104 (01) :229-244
[110]   Policy analysis and environmental problems at different scales: asking the right questions [J].
Tomich, TP ;
Chomitz, K ;
Francisco, H ;
Izac, AMN ;
Murdiyarso, D ;
Ratner, BD ;
Thomas, DE ;
van Noordwijk, M .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2004, 104 (01) :5-18