Women's psychosocial outcomes following an emergency caesarean section: A systematic literature review

被引:48
作者
Benton, Madeleine [1 ]
Salter, Amy [2 ]
Tape, Nicole [1 ]
Wilkinson, Chris [3 ]
Turnbull, Deborah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Psychol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Womens & Childrens Hosp, Maternal Fetal Med, Adelaide, SA, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Systematic literature review; Childbirth; Emergency caesarean section; Psychosocial outcomes; Maternal health; Postpartum; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS; SELF-ESTEEM; PRIMIPAROUS WOMEN; 1ST-TIME MOTHERS; SEXUAL FUNCTION; DELIVERY; CHILDBIRTH; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-019-2687-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Given the sudden and unexpected nature of an emergency caesarean section (EmCS) coupled with an increased risk of psychological distress, it is particularly important to understand the psychosocial outcomes for women. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify, collate and examine the evidence surrounding women's psychosocial outcomes of EmCS worldwide. Methods: The electronic databases of EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO were searched between November 2017 and March 2018. To ensure articles were reflective of original and recently published research, the search criteria included peer-reviewed research articles published within the last 20 years (1998 to 2018). All study designs were included if they incorporated an examination of women's psychosocial outcomes after EmCS. Due to inherent heterogeneity of study data, extraction and synthesis of both qualitative and quantitative data pertaining to key psychosocial outcomes were organised into coherent themes and analysis was attempted. Results: In total 17,189 articles were identified. Of these, 208 full text articles were assessed for eligibility. One hundred forty-nine articles were further excluded, resulting in the inclusion of 66 articles in the current systematic literature review. While meta-analyses were not possible due to the nature of the heterogeneity, key psychosocial outcomes identified that were negatively impacted by EmCS included post-traumatic stress, health-related quality of life, experiences, infant-feeding, satisfaction, and self-esteem. Post-traumatic stress was one of the most commonly examined psychosocial outcomes, with a strong consensus that EmCS contributes to both symptoms and diagnosis. Conclusions: EmCS was found to negatively impact several psychosocial outcomes for women in particular post-traumatic stress. While investment in technologies and clinical practice to minimise the number of EmCSs is crucial, further investigations are needed to develop effective strategies to prepare and support women who experience this type of birth.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section, 2000-2004, at the Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne
    Popham, P.
    Buettner, A.
    Mendola, M.
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2007, 35 (01) : 74 - 79
  • [32] Caesarean section in women following an abdominal myomectomy: a choice or a need?
    Odejinmi, F.
    Strong, S.
    Sideris, M.
    Mallick, R.
    FACTS VIEWS AND VISION IN OBGYN, 2020, 12 (01) : 57 - 60
  • [33] Women's Awareness of the Risks of Caesarean Section in Saudi Arabia.
    Riri, Abeer Soliman
    Alsafari, Ala'a Mohammed
    Yahya, Mozi Abdulhaq
    Alamri, Shua'a Talal
    Almaflehi, Randa Abdulsalam
    Alfaqih, Samar Mohammed
    Alshaikhi, Fatimah Abdullah
    Alotaib, Abdulaziz Naif
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCE AND PHARMA RESEARCH, 2020, 10 (05): : L150 - L156
  • [34] Maternity service organisational interventions that aim to reduce caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analyses
    Chapman, Anna
    Nagle, Cate
    Bick, Debra
    Lindberg, Rebecca
    Kent, Bridie
    Calache, Justin
    Hutchinson, Alison M.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [35] Protective factors for psychosocial outcomes following cumulative childhood adversity: systematic review
    Buchanan, Mary
    Walker, Grace
    Boden, Joseph M.
    Mansoor, Zara
    Newton-Howes, Giles
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2023, 9 (06):
  • [36] Women's Views on Elective Primary Caesarean Section
    Pakenham, Susan
    Chamberlain, Susan M.
    Smith, Graeme N.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2006, 28 (12) : 1089 - 1094
  • [37] Uterine wound healing after caesarean section: A systematic review
    Debras, E.
    Capmas, P.
    Maudot, C.
    Chavatte-Palmer, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 296 : 83 - 90
  • [38] Perinatal health outcomes of women from Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities: A systematic review
    Ekezie, Winifred
    Hopwood, Ellen
    Czyznikowska, Barbara
    Weidman, Sarah
    Mackintosh, Nicola
    Curtis, Ffion
    MIDWIFERY, 2024, 129
  • [39] Concerning the timing of antibiotic administration in women undergoing caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Heesen, Michael
    Kloehr, Sven
    Rossaint, Rolf
    Allegaert, Karel
    Deprest, Jan
    Van de Velde, Marc
    Straube, Sebastian
    BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (04):
  • [40] Incidence of surgical site infection following caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Saeed, Khalid B. M.
    Greene, Richard A.
    Corcoran, Paul
    O'Neill, Sinead M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (01):