Women's psychosocial outcomes following an emergency caesarean section: A systematic literature review

被引:48
作者
Benton, Madeleine [1 ]
Salter, Amy [2 ]
Tape, Nicole [1 ]
Wilkinson, Chris [3 ]
Turnbull, Deborah [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Sch Psychol, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Sch Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Womens & Childrens Hosp, Maternal Fetal Med, Adelaide, SA, Australia
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Systematic literature review; Childbirth; Emergency caesarean section; Psychosocial outcomes; Maternal health; Postpartum; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; POSTPARTUM DEPRESSION; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS; SELF-ESTEEM; PRIMIPAROUS WOMEN; 1ST-TIME MOTHERS; SEXUAL FUNCTION; DELIVERY; CHILDBIRTH; EXPERIENCES;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-019-2687-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Given the sudden and unexpected nature of an emergency caesarean section (EmCS) coupled with an increased risk of psychological distress, it is particularly important to understand the psychosocial outcomes for women. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify, collate and examine the evidence surrounding women's psychosocial outcomes of EmCS worldwide. Methods: The electronic databases of EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and PsycINFO were searched between November 2017 and March 2018. To ensure articles were reflective of original and recently published research, the search criteria included peer-reviewed research articles published within the last 20 years (1998 to 2018). All study designs were included if they incorporated an examination of women's psychosocial outcomes after EmCS. Due to inherent heterogeneity of study data, extraction and synthesis of both qualitative and quantitative data pertaining to key psychosocial outcomes were organised into coherent themes and analysis was attempted. Results: In total 17,189 articles were identified. Of these, 208 full text articles were assessed for eligibility. One hundred forty-nine articles were further excluded, resulting in the inclusion of 66 articles in the current systematic literature review. While meta-analyses were not possible due to the nature of the heterogeneity, key psychosocial outcomes identified that were negatively impacted by EmCS included post-traumatic stress, health-related quality of life, experiences, infant-feeding, satisfaction, and self-esteem. Post-traumatic stress was one of the most commonly examined psychosocial outcomes, with a strong consensus that EmCS contributes to both symptoms and diagnosis. Conclusions: EmCS was found to negatively impact several psychosocial outcomes for women in particular post-traumatic stress. While investment in technologies and clinical practice to minimise the number of EmCSs is crucial, further investigations are needed to develop effective strategies to prepare and support women who experience this type of birth.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Women’s psychosocial outcomes following an emergency caesarean section: A systematic literature review
    Madeleine Benton
    Amy Salter
    Nicole Tape
    Chris Wilkinson
    Deborah Turnbull
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19
  • [2] How is women's demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review
    Schantz, Clemence
    de Loenzien, Myriam
    Goyet, Sophie
    Ravit, Marion
    Dancoisne, Aurelien
    Dumont, Alexandre
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (03):
  • [3] Reduced length of hospital stay after caesarean section: A systematic review examining women's experiences and psychosocial outcomes
    Digenis, Christianna
    Salter, Amy
    Cusack, Lynette
    Koch, Ashlee
    Turnbull, Deborah
    MIDWIFERY, 2020, 91
  • [4] Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Mazzoni, A.
    Althabe, F.
    Liu, N. H.
    Bonotti, A. M.
    Gibbons, L.
    Sanchez, A. J.
    Belizan, J. M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 118 (04) : 391 - 399
  • [5] Women's experience of an emergency caesarean birth
    Somera, Marie J.
    Feeley, Nancy
    Ciofani, Luisa
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2010, 19 (19-20) : 2824 - 2831
  • [6] Women-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): A systematic review
    Nilsson, Christina
    Lundgren, Ingela
    Smith, Valerie
    Vehvilainen-Julkunen, Katri
    Nicoletti, Jane
    Devane, Declan
    Bernloehr, Annette
    van Limbeek, Evelien
    Lalor, Joan
    Begley, Cecily
    MIDWIFERY, 2015, 31 (07) : 657 - 663
  • [7] The psychosocial outcomes following cosmetic surgery are largely unknown: A systematic review
    Garbett, Kirsty M.
    Paraskeva, Nicole
    White, Paul
    Lewis-Smith, Helena
    Smith, Harriet
    Anquandah, Jason
    Diedrichs, Phillippa C.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2025, 104 : 282 - 297
  • [8] Interventions in Reducing Caesarean Section in the World: A Systematic Review
    Moradi, Farideh
    Aryankhesal, Aidin
    Heidari, Mohammad
    Soroush, Ali
    Sadr, Sara Rahimi
    MALAYSIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 26 (05): : 21 - 37
  • [9] Emergency caesarean section in low risk nulliparous women
    Haerskjold, A.
    Hegaard, H. K.
    Kjaergaard, H.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 32 (06) : 543 - 547
  • [10] Prevalence of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Following Caesarean Section: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Yanfang
    Yang, Xiaoxian
    Guo, Chentao
    Liao, Yan
    Guo, Lixing
    Chen, Wenjun
    Chen, Innie
    Krewski, Daniel
    Wen, Shi Wu
    Xie, Ri-hua
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 29 (02) : 200 - 209