A retrospective analysis illustrating the substantial clinical and economic burden of prostate cancer

被引:42
作者
Crawford, E. D. [2 ]
Black, L. [3 ]
Eaddy, M. [1 ]
Kruep, E. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Xcenda LLC, Palm Harbor, FL 34685 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Urol Oncol, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[3] GlaxoSmithKline Inc, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
关键词
economic burden; watchful waiting; treatment; cost; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CHEMOPREVENTION; MANAGEMENT; TRIAL; MEN;
D O I
10.1038/pcan.2009.63
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the treatment patterns and resource utilization of various prostate cancer treatments, and quantify the economic and clinical impact of each. In a retrospective analysis of medical and pharmacy claims between 2000 and 2005, using the PharMetrics database, male patients aged >= 40 years with prostate cancer diagnosis were identified. The costs of medical and prostate cancer-related expenditures for the treatment options were determined for three periods: from diagnosis to first treatment, during and after treatment. A total of 9035 patients were included. The mean age of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer was 61.4 years. Patients aged 50-59 years represented the highest proportion at 51%. The majority received some form of treatment. Watchful waiting (WW) was the primary means of management for 30%. The average 2-year cost for WW was $ 24 809 and for active treatment was $ 59 286. Surgery was the most common treatment among younger men. Non-cancer-related costs were similar among those receiving treatment or WW, but prostate cancer costs were over five times greater in the treated patients. With or without treatment, prostate cancer is a significant clinical and economic burden to society. New strategies for treatment or cancer prevention could play a role in reducing this burden. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2010) 13, 162-167; doi: 10.1038/pcan.2009.63; published online 2 February 2010
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 167
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   20-year outcomes following conservative management of clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Albertsen, PC ;
Hanley, JA ;
Fine, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (17) :2095-2101
[2]   Radical retropubic versus laparoscopic prostatectomy: A prospective comparison of functional outcome [J].
Anastasiadis, AG ;
Salomon, L ;
Katz, R ;
Hoznek, A ;
Chopin, D ;
Abbou, CC .
UROLOGY, 2003, 62 (02) :292-297
[3]  
ANDRIOLE GL, 2009, AM UR ASS 2009 ANN M
[4]  
[Anonymous], PHYS FEE COD GUID 20
[5]  
[Anonymous], CANC FACTS FIG 2007
[6]  
[Anonymous], CANC TRENDS PROGR RE
[7]  
[Anonymous], CANC FACTS FIG 2008
[8]   Critical Review: Is Watchful Waiting a Viable Management Option for Older Men With Prostate Cancer? [J].
Bailey, Donald E., Jr. ;
Wallace, Meredith .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2007, 1 (01) :18-28
[9]   Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer [J].
Bill-Axelson, A ;
Holmberg, L ;
Ruutu, M ;
Häggman, M ;
Andersson, SO ;
Bratell, S ;
Spångberg, A ;
Busch, C ;
Nordling, S ;
Garmo, H ;
Palmgren, J ;
Adami, HO ;
Norlén, BJ ;
Johansson, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (19) :1977-1984
[10]  
Brown ML, 2002, MED CARE, V40, P104