The impact of certificate of need programs on neonatal intensive care units

被引:33
作者
Lorch, S. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Maheshwari, P. [4 ]
Even-Shoshan, O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Ctr Outcomes Res, Dept Pediat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Hospital beds; regionalization of perinatal care; LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; HEALTH-CARE; PERINATAL REGIONALIZATION; MORTALITY; INFANTS; REGULATIONS; DELIVERY; VOLUME; STATES; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1038/jp.2011.47
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the impact of state certificate of need programs (CON) on the number of hospitals with neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and the number of NICU beds. Study Design: The presence of a CON program was verified from each state's department of health. Multivariable regression models determined the association between the absence of a CON program and each outcome after controlling for socioeconomic and demographic differences between states. Result: A total of 30 states had CON programs that oversaw NICUs in 2008. Absence of such programs was associated with more hospitals with a NICU (Rate Ratio (RR) 2.06, 95% CI 1.74 to 2.45) and NICU beds (RR 1.96, 95% CI 1.89 to 2.03) compared with states with CON legislation, and increased all-infant mortality rates in states with a large metropolitan area. Conclusion: There has been an erosion of CON programs that oversee NICUs. CON programs are associated with more efficient delivery of neonatal care. Journal of Perinatology (2012) 32, 39-44; doi:10.1038/jp.2011.47; published online 28 April 2011
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 44
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 105CMR MA DEP PUBL H
  • [2] Managed care, technology adoption, and health care: the adoption of neonatal intensive care
    Baker, LC
    Phibbs, CS
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2002, 33 (03) : 524 - 548
  • [3] Hospital neonatal services in the United States: variation in definitions, criteria, and regulatory status, 2008
    Blackmon, L. R.
    Barfield, W. D.
    Stark, A. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2009, 29 (12) : 788 - 794
  • [4] Perinatal regionalization and neonatal mortality in North Carolina, 1968-1994
    Bode, MM
    O'Shea, TM
    Metzguer, KR
    Stiles, AD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 184 (06) : 1302 - 1307
  • [5] Mortality in low birth weight infants according to level of neonatal care at hospital of birth
    Cifuentes, J
    Bronstein, J
    Phibbs, CS
    Phibbs, RH
    Schmitt, SK
    Carlo, WA
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2002, 109 (05) : 745 - 751
  • [6] Conover CJ, 1998, J HEALTH POLIT POLIC, V23, P455
  • [7] Cromwell J, 1987, Health Care Financ Rev, V8, P69
  • [8] Patient preferences for location of care - Implications for regionalization
    Finlayson, SRG
    Birkmeyer, JD
    Tosteson, ANA
    Nease, RF
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1999, 37 (02) : 204 - 209
  • [9] Garrison L P Jr, 1991, Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl, P13
  • [10] Expansion of community-based perinatal care in California
    Gould J.B.
    Marks A.R.
    Chavez G.
    [J]. Journal of Perinatology, 2002, 22 (8) : 630 - 640