Device-related reoperations after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

被引:0
|
作者
Lyass, S [1 ]
Cunneen, SA [1 ]
Hagiike, M [1 ]
Misra, M [1 ]
Burch, M [1 ]
Khalili, TM [1 ]
Furman, G [1 ]
Phillips, EH [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is considered a relatively safe weight loss procedure with low morbidity. When complications occur, obstruction, erosion, and port malfunction require reoperation. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with 270 consecutive patients who underwent LAGB. Device-related reoperations were performed in 26 (10%) patients. Reoperations were related to the band in 13, to port/tubing in 11, and related to both in 2 patients. Of the 15 band-related problems, it was removed in 5 (2%): slippage (3), intra-abdominal abscess (1), and during emergent operation for bleeding duodenal ulcer (1). Revision or immediate replacement was performed in 10 (4%): slippage (5), obstruction (4), and leak from the reservoir (1). Port/tubing problems were the reason for reoperations in 13 (5%): infection (5), crack at tubing-port connection (6), and port rotation (2). Port removal for infection was followed later by port replacement (average 9 months). Overall, slippage occurred in 8 (3%), obstruction in 4 (1.5%), leak from reservoir in 7 (3%), and infection in 5 (2%) patients. Fifteen device-related problems occurred during our first 100 cases and 12 subsequently (P = 0.057). Permanent LapBand loss was only 5 per cent, leading to overall rate of 95 per cent of LapBand preservation as a restrictive device.
引用
收藏
页码:738 / 743
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prosthesis related sepsis following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding
    Facek, Michael
    Receveur, Imke
    Darbar, Archie
    Richardson, Andrea
    Leibman, Steven
    Smith, Garett
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 80 (7-8) : 506 - 509
  • [32] Single Incision Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding And Traditional Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: A Matched Comparison
    Chakravartty, S.
    Murgatroyd, B.
    Singh, U.
    Jain, G.
    Howlader, M.
    Ashton, D.
    Patel, A.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2011, 21 (08) : 997 - 997
  • [33] Gastric cancer after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: case report
    Szewczyk, Tomasz
    Janczak, Przemyslaw
    Modzelewski, Bogdan
    VIDEOSURGERY AND OTHER MINIINVASIVE TECHNIQUES, 2012, 7 (03) : 210 - 212
  • [34] Augmenting weight loss after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding by laparoscopic gastric plication
    Huang, Chih-Kun
    Asim, Shabbir
    Lo, Chi-Hsien
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2011, 7 (02) : 235 - 236
  • [35] Reoperations after failed gastric banding
    Lavryk, A
    Tyvonchuk, O
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2006, 16 (04) : 421 - 421
  • [36] Long Term Outcome After Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding
    Stockman, A.
    Snoeck, E.
    Van Ommeslaeghe, H.
    Van Renterghem, K.
    Van de Putte, D.
    Ceelen, W.
    Pattyn, P.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2009, 19 (08) : 1034 - 1034
  • [37] Analysis of poor outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding
    Kasza, Jason
    Brody, Fred
    Vaziri, Khashayar
    Scheffey, Carl
    Mcmullan, Sheldon
    Wallace, Brian
    Khambaty, Fatima
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (01): : 41 - 47
  • [38] Is Esophageal Dysmotility after Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding Reversible?
    Enrico Facchiano
    Stefano Scaringi
    Jean-Marc Sabate
    Mohamed Merrouche
    Pauline Jouet
    Benoit Coffin
    Simon Msika
    Obesity Surgery, 2007, 17 : 832 - 835
  • [39] Prevention of catheter disconnection after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding
    Zieren, J
    Menenakos, C
    Paul, M
    Müller, JM
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES-PART A, 2004, 14 (02): : 77 - 79
  • [40] Systematic Review of Erosion after Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding
    Kristine Egberts
    Wendy A. Brown
    Paul E. O’Brien
    Obesity Surgery, 2011, 21 : 1272 - 1279