HBOC multi-gene panel testing: comparison of two sequencing centers

被引:34
作者
Schroeder, Christopher [1 ]
Faust, Ulrike [1 ]
Sturm, Marc [1 ]
Hackmann, Karl [2 ]
Grundmann, Kathrin [1 ]
Harmuth, Florian [1 ]
Bosse, Kristin [1 ]
Kehrer, Martin [1 ]
Benkert, Tanja [1 ]
Klink, Barbara [2 ]
Mackenroth, Luisa [2 ]
Betcheva-Krajcir, Elitza [2 ]
Wimberger, Pauline [3 ]
Kast, Karin [3 ]
Heilig, Mechthilde [1 ]
Huu Phuc Nguyen [1 ]
Riess, Olaf [1 ]
Schroeck, Evelin [2 ]
Bauer, Peter [1 ]
Rump, Andreas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Inst Med Genet & Appl Genom, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Klin Genet, Med Fak Carl Gustav Carus, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Klin & Poliklin Frauenheilkunde & Geburtshilfe, Univ Klinikum Carl Gustav Carus, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Next-generation sequencing; Amplicon; Capture; Benchmark test; Cancer susceptibility; BREAST-CANCER; HEREDITARY BREAST; GENETIC DIAGNOSTICS; GERMLINE MUTATIONS; GENOMIC CAPTURE; BRCA2; MUTATIONS; SUSCEPTIBILITY; CANDIDATE;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-015-3429-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Multi-gene panels are used to identify genetic causes of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) in large patient cohorts. This study compares the diagnostic workflow in two centers and gives valuable insights into different next-generation sequencing (NGS) strategies. Moreover, we present data from 620 patients sequenced at both centers. Both sequencing centers are part of the German consortium for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (GC-HBOC). All 620 patients included in this study were selected following standard BRCA1/2 testing guidelines. A set of 10 sequenced genes was analyzed per patient. Twelve samples were exchanged and sequenced at both centers. NGS results were highly concordant in 12 exchanged samples (205/206 variants = 99.51 %). One non-pathogenic variant was missed at center B due to a sequencing gap (no technical coverage). The custom enrichment at center B was optimized during this study; for example, the average number of missing bases was reduced by a factor of four (vers. 1: 1939.41, vers. 4: 506.01 bp). There were no sequencing gaps at center A, but four CCDS exons were not included in the enrichment. Pathogenic mutations were found in 12.10 % (75/620) of all patients: 4.84 % (30/620) in BRCA1, 4.35 % in BRCA2 (27/620), 0.97 % in CHEK2 (6/620), 0.65 % in ATM (4/620), 0.48 % in CDH1 (3/620), 0.32 % in PALB2 (2/620), 0.32 % in NBN (2/620), and 0.16 % in TP53 (1/620). NGS diagnostics for HBOC-related genes is robust, cost effective, and the method of choice for genetic testing in large cohorts. Adding 8 genes to standard BRCA1- and BRCA2-testing increased the mutation detection rate by one-third.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 136
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies [J].
Antoniou, A ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Narod, S ;
Risch, HA ;
Eyfjord, JE ;
Hopper, JL ;
Loman, N ;
Olsson, H ;
Johannsson, O ;
Borg, Å ;
Pasini, B ;
Radice, P ;
Manoukian, S ;
Eccles, DM ;
Tang, N ;
Olah, E ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Warner, E ;
Lubinski, J ;
Gronwald, J ;
Gorski, B ;
Tulinius, H ;
Thorlacius, S ;
Eerola, H ;
Nevanlinna, H ;
Syrjäkoski, K ;
Kallioniemi, OP ;
Thompson, D ;
Evans, C ;
Peto, J ;
Lalloo, F ;
Evans, DG ;
Easton, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) :1117-1130
[2]   Hereditary Breast Cancer: The Era of New Susceptibility Genes [J].
Apostolou, Paraskevi ;
Fostira, Florentia .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 2013
[3]   Rapid and cost effective screening of breast and ovarian cancer genes using novel sequence capture method in clinical samples [J].
Arvai, Kristf ;
Horvath, Peter ;
Balla, Bernadett ;
Tokes, Anna M. ;
Tobias, Balint ;
Takacs, Istvan ;
Nagy, Zsolt ;
Lakatos, Peter ;
Kosa, Janos P. .
FAMILIAL CANCER, 2014, 13 (04) :583-589
[4]   Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58 209 women with breast cancer and 101 986 women without the disease [J].
Beral, V ;
Bull, D ;
Doll, R ;
Peto, R ;
Reeves, G .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9291) :1389-1399
[5]   Genetic susceptibility to breast cancer [J].
Bradbury, Angela R. ;
Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. .
REVIEWS IN ENDOCRINE & METABOLIC DISORDERS, 2007, 8 (03) :255-267
[6]   Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture targeting multiple candidate genes [J].
Castera, Laurent ;
Krieger, Sophie ;
Rousselin, Antoine ;
Legros, Angelina ;
Baumann, Jean-Jacques ;
Bruet, Olivia ;
Brault, Baptiste ;
Fouillet, Robin ;
Goardon, Nicolas ;
Letac, Olivier ;
Baert-Desurmont, Stephanie ;
Tinat, Julie ;
Bera, Odile ;
Dugast, Catherine ;
Berthet, Pascaline ;
Polycarpe, Florence ;
Layet, Valerie ;
Hardouin, Agnes ;
Frebourg, Thierry ;
Vaur, Dominique .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2014, 22 (11) :1305-1313
[7]   Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance [J].
Chen, Sining ;
Parmigiani, Giovanni .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (11) :1329-1333
[8]   Characterization of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a large United States sample [J].
Chen, SN ;
Iversen, ES ;
Friebel, T ;
Finkelstein, D ;
Weber, BL ;
Eisen, A ;
Peterson, LE ;
Schildkraut, JM ;
Isaacs, C ;
Peshkin, BN ;
Corio, C ;
Leondaridis, L ;
Tomlinson, G ;
Dutsm, D ;
Kerber, R ;
Amos, CI ;
Strong, LC ;
Berry, DA ;
Euthus, DM ;
Parmigiani, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (06) :863-871
[9]   The Validation and Clinical Implementation of BRCAplus: A Comprehensive High-Risk Breast Cancer Diagnostic Assay [J].
Chong, Hansook Kim ;
Wang, Tao ;
Lu, Hsiao-Mei ;
Seidler, Sara ;
Lu, Hong ;
Keiles, Steven ;
Chao, Elizabeth C. ;
Stuenkel, A. J. ;
Li, Xiang ;
Elliott, Aaron M. .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (05)
[10]   Mutations predisposing to breast cancer in 12 candidate genes in breast cancer patients from Poland [J].
Cybulski, C. ;
Lubinski, J. ;
Wokolorczyk, D. ;
Kuzniak, W. ;
Kashyap, A. ;
Sopik, V. ;
Huzarski, T. ;
Gronwald, J. ;
Byrski, T. ;
Szwiec, M. ;
Jakubowska, A. ;
Gorski, B. ;
Debniak, T. ;
Narod, S. A. ;
Akbari, M. R. .
CLINICAL GENETICS, 2015, 88 (04) :366-370