A literature review of the use of environmental sampling in the surveillance of avian influenza viruses

被引:24
作者
Hood, Grace [1 ]
Roche, Xavier [1 ]
Brioudes, Aurelie [2 ]
von Dobschuetz, Sophie [1 ]
Fasina, Folorunso Oludayo [3 ]
Kalpravidh, Wantanee [1 ]
Makonnen, Yilma [4 ]
Lubroth, Juan [1 ]
Sims, Leslie [5 ]
机构
[1] Food & Agr Org United Nations, Rome, Italy
[2] Food & Agr Org United Nations, Reg Off Asia & Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand
[3] Food & Agr Org United Nations, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
[4] Food & Agr Org United Nations, Subreg Off Eastern Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[5] Asia Pacific Vet Informat Serv, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
avian Influenza; environmental sampling; epidemiological monitoring; surveillance; LIVE-POULTRY MARKETS; MIGRATORY WATER BIRDS; HIGHLY PATHOGENIC H5N1; RISK-BASED SURVEILLANCE; WILD BIRDS; A VIRUS; DOMESTIC POULTRY; ZHEJIANG PROVINCE; SOUTH-KOREA; HONG-KONG;
D O I
10.1111/tbed.13633
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
This literature review provides an overview of use of environmental samples (ES) such as faeces, water, air, mud and swabs of surfaces in avian influenza (AI) surveillance programs, focussing on effectiveness, advantages and gaps in knowledge. ES have been used effectively for AI surveillance since the 1970s. Results from ES have enhanced understanding of the biology of AI viruses in wild birds and in markets, of links between human and avian influenza, provided early warning of viral incursions, allowed assessment of effectiveness of control and preventive measures, and assisted epidemiological studies in outbreaks, both avian and human. Variation exists in the methods and protocols used, and no internationally recognized guidelines exist on the use of ES and data management. Few studies have performed direct comparisons of ES versus live bird samples (LBS). Results reported so far demonstrate reliance on ES will not be sufficient to detect virus in all cases when it is present, especially when the prevalence of infection/contamination is low. Multiple sample types should be collected. In live bird markets, ES from processing/selling areas are more likely to test positive than samples from bird holding areas. When compared to LBS, ES is considered a cost-effective, simple, rapid, flexible, convenient and acceptable way of achieving surveillance objectives. As a non-invasive technique, it can minimize effects on animal welfare and trade in markets and reduce impacts on wild bird communities. Some limitations of environmental sampling methods have been identified, such as the loss of species-specific or information on the source of virus, and taxonomic-level analyses, unless additional methods are applied. Some studies employing ES have not provided detailed methods. In others, where ES and LBS are collected from the same site, positive results have not been assigned to specific sample types. These gaps should be remedied in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 126
页数:17
相关论文
共 218 条
  • [11] Annual Report on surveillance for avian influenza in poultry and wild birds in Member States of the European Union in 2018
    Brouwer, Adam
    Gonzales, Jose
    Huneau, Adeline
    Mulatti, Paolo
    Kuiken, Thijs
    Staubach, Christoph
    Stegeman, Arjan
    Antoniou, Sotiria-Eleni
    Baldinelli, Francesca
    Van der Stede, Yves
    Aznar, Inma
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2019, 17 (12)
  • [12] Brugh M., 2003, Avian Dis, V47, P177
  • [13] Bioaerosol Sampling to Detect Avian Influenza Virus in Hanoi's Largest Live Poultry Market
    Bui, Vuong N.
    Nguyen, Tham T.
    Hung Nguyen-Viet
    Bui, Anh N.
    McCallion, Katie A.
    Lee, Hu Suk
    Than, Son T.
    Coleman, Kristen K.
    Gray, Gregory C.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 68 (06) : 972 - 975
  • [14] Surveillance of Avian Influenza Virus in Migratory Water Birds in Eastern Hokkaido, Japan
    Bui, Vuong N.
    Ogawa, Haruko
    Karibe, Kazuji
    Matsuo, Kengo
    Nguyen, Tung H.
    Awad, Sanaa S. A.
    Minoungou, Germaine L.
    Xininigen
    Saito, Keisuke
    Watanabe, Yukiko
    Runstadler, Jonathan A.
    Happ, George M.
    Imai, Kunitoshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 73 (02) : 209 - 215
  • [15] Descriptive and surveillance studies of suppliers to New York and New Jersey retail live-bird markets
    Bulaga, LL
    Garber, L
    Senne, D
    Myers, TJ
    Good, R
    Wainwright, S
    Suarez, DL
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 2003, 47 : 1169 - 1176
  • [16] Epidemiologic and surveillance studies on avian influenza in live-bird markets in New York and New Jersey, 2001
    Bulaga, LL
    Garber, L
    Senne, DA
    Myers, TJ
    Good, R
    Wainwright, S
    Trock, S
    Suarez, DL
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 2003, 47 : 996 - 1001
  • [17] Influenza A virus subtypes in wild birds in North-Eastern Spain (Catalonia)
    Busquets, Nuria
    Alba, Anna
    Napp, Sebastian
    Sanchez, Azucena
    Serrano, Erika
    Rivas, Raquel
    Nunez, Jose I.
    Majo, Natalia
    [J]. VIRUS RESEARCH, 2010, 149 (01) : 10 - 18
  • [18] Continued circulation in China of highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses encoding the hemagglutinin gene associated with the 1997 H5N1 outbreak in poultry and humans
    Cauthen, AN
    Swayne, DE
    Schultz-Cherry, S
    Perdue, ML
    Suarez, DL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 2000, 74 (14) : 6592 - 6599
  • [19] Diversity and evolution of avian influenza viruses in live poultry markets, free-range poultry and wild wetland birds in China
    Chen, Liang-Jun
    Lin, Xian-Dan
    Guo, Wen-Ping
    Tian, Jun-Hua
    Wang, Wen
    Ying, Xu-Hua
    Wang, Miao-Ruo
    Yu, Bin
    Yang, Zhan-Qiu
    Shi, Mang
    Holmes, Edward C.
    Zhang, Yong-Zhen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY, 2016, 97 : 844 - 854
  • [20] Ambient Influenza and Avian Influenza Virus during Dust Storm Days and Background Days
    Chen, Pei-Shih
    Tsai, Feng Ta
    Lin, Chien Kun
    Yang, Chun-Yuh
    Chan, Chang-Chuan
    Young, Chea-Yuan
    Lee, Chien-Hung
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2010, 118 (09) : 1211 - 1216