Factors affecting retention of allied health professionals working with people with disability in rural New South Wales, Australia: discrete choice experiment questionnaire development

被引:19
作者
Gallego, Gisselle [1 ,2 ]
Dew, Angela [3 ]
Bulkeley, Kim [2 ]
Veitch, Craig [2 ]
Lincoln, Michelle [2 ]
Bundy, Anita [2 ]
Brentnall, Jennie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Sydney, Sch Med, Ctr Hlth Res, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia
[3] Univ New S Wales, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Discrete choice experiment; Allied health professionals; Preferences; Retention; Rural; Disability; POLICY; RECRUITMENT; WORKFORCE; SECTOR; PERSPECTIVES; PREFERENCES; DELIVERY; SERVICES; ISSUES; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12960-015-0013-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This paper describes the development of a discrete choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire to identify the factors (attributes) that allied health professionals (AHPs) working with people with disability identify as important to encouraging them to remain practising in rural areas. Methods: Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 97 purposively selected service providers working with people with disability in rural New South Wales, Australia. Focus groups and interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, and analysed using a modified grounded theory approach involving thematic analysis and constant comparison. Results: Six attributes that may influence AHPs working with people with disability in rural areas to continue to do so were inductively identified: travel arrangements, work flexibility, professional support, professional development, remuneration, and autonomy of practice. The qualitative research information was combined with a policy review to define these retention factors and ensure that they are amenable to policy changes. Conclusion: The use of various qualitative research methods allowed the development of a policy-relevant DCE questionnaire that was grounded in the experience of the target population (AHPs).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   What do people value when they provide unpaid care for an older person? A meta-ethnography with interview follow-up [J].
Al-Janabi, Hareth ;
Coast, Joanna ;
Flynn, Terry N. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2008, 67 (01) :111-121
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, 32180 REG POP GROWTH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, AUSTRALIAS HLTH WORK
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Constructing Grounded Theory
[5]  
[Anonymous], AUSTR ALL HLTH WORKF
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PERS PLAC US RES LGA
[7]  
[Anonymous], FORM NAT DIS WORKF S
[8]  
Becker S., 2011, CRITICAL SHORTAGE AL
[9]   Allied health in Central Australia: Challenges and rewards in remote area practice [J].
Bent, A .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 1999, 45 (03) :203-212
[10]   One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? [J].
Braun, Virginia ;
Clarke, Victoria .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) :328-352