Do Community Health Worker Interventions Improve Rates of Screening Mammography in the United States? A Systematic Review

被引:117
作者
Wells, Kristen J. [1 ,2 ]
Luque, John S. [2 ,3 ]
Miladinovic, Branko [1 ]
Vargas, Natalia [2 ]
Asvat, Yasmin [1 ,2 ]
Roetzheim, Richard G. [1 ,2 ]
Kumar, Ambuj [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr, Tampa, FL 33682 USA
[3] Georgia So Univ, Statesboro, GA 30460 USA
关键词
CLUSTER RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN; BREAST-CANCER; PROMOTE MAMMOGRAPHY; DISPARITIES; INCOME; IMPACT; RACE; CARE; POPULATION;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0276
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Community health workers (CHW) are lay individuals who are trained to serve as liaisons between members of their communities and health care providers and services. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to synthesize evidence from all prospective controlled studies on effectiveness of CHW programs in improving screening mammography rates. Studies reported in English and conducted in the United States were included if they: (i) evaluated a CHW intervention designed to increase screening mammography rates in women 40 years of age or older without a history of breast cancer; (ii) were a randomized controlled trial (RCT), case-controlled study, or quasi-experimental study; and (iii) evaluated a CHW intervention outside of a hospital setting. Results: Participation in a CHW intervention was associated with a statistically significant increase in receipt of screening mammography [risk ratio (RR): 1.06 (favoring intervention); 95% CI: 1.02-1.11, P = 0.003]. The effect remained when pooled data from only RCTs were included in meta-analysis (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.03-1.12, P = 0.0005) but was not present using pooled data from only quasi-experimental studies (RR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.89-1.18, P = 0.71). In RCTs, participants recruited from medical settings (RR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.09-1.82, P = 0.008), programs conducted in urban settings (RR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.39, P = 0.001), and programs where CHWs were matched to intervention participants on race or ethnicity (RR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.29-1.93, P = 0.0001) showed stronger effects on increasing mammography screening rates. Conclusions: CHW interventions are effective for increasing screening mammography in certain settings and populations. Impact: CHW interventions are especially associated with improvements in rate of screening mammography in medical settings, urban settings, and in participants who are racially or ethnically concordant with the CHW. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(8); 1580-98. (C)2011 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:1580 / 1598
页数:19
相关论文
共 72 条
[41]  
Montori VM, 2001, CAN MED ASSOC J, V165, P1339
[42]  
*MRC BIOST UN, 2010, BUGS PROJ BAYES INF
[43]  
Navarro A M, 1995, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P137
[44]  
Navarro A. M., 2000, WOMEN CANC J, V2, P23
[45]   Por La Vida model intervention enhances use of cancer screening tests among Latinas [J].
Navarro, AM ;
Senn, KL ;
McNicholas, LJ ;
Kaplan, RM ;
Roppe, B ;
Campo, MC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 15 (01) :32-41
[46]   Diffusion of cancer education information through a Latino community health advisor program [J].
Navarro, Ana M. ;
Raman, Rema ;
McNicholas, Lori J. ;
Loza, Oralia .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 45 (2-3) :135-138
[47]  
Ntzoufras I., 2009, BAYESIAN MODELING US, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470434567
[48]  
Paskett ED, 1999, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V8, P453
[49]   Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women [J].
Paskett, Electra ;
Tatum, Cathy ;
Rushing, Julia ;
Michielutte, Robert ;
Bell, Ronny ;
Foley, Kristie Long ;
Bittoni, Marisa ;
Dickinson, Stephanie L. ;
McAlearney, Ann Scheck ;
Reeves, Katherine .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17) :1226-1237
[50]   Disparities in screening mammography - Current status, interventions, and implications [J].
Peek, ME ;
Han, JH .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 (02) :184-194